| |
| | Post 31 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
And if they could do it with cruise and stealth the first time around, why would there need to be a "second wave"? It's not that big an objective. If there was a second package, they'd prolly want some stand-off and stealth as well since the AD system will have time to gear up. Sexy doesn't always mean smart. | |
| |
| | Post 32 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
__________________ | |
| |
| | Post 33 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I believe we know how the US would handle a strike. I'm wondering what options the isrelis have with no US millitary support. |
| |
| | Post 34 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
They have no friendly skys to fly over and with syria sideing with Iran now. I just dont see how they would get to Iran regardless if they have the aircraft to carry out the strike. | |
| |
| | Post 35 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | So you think the Israelis will just sit by and let Iran go nuclear? |
| |
| | Post 36 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
I just dont see the new Iraqi government or any middle eastern country letting the Iraelis use there air space for the fear of proveking another Iran-Iraq war. or fuel civil un-rest in their own countries for helping Israel out. The only nations I could imagine allowing Israel to fly over would be Jordan because of its strong pro-west population and government and Iraq due to American pressure. Even then without US refueling capabilities the jets would never even have a shot of makeing it to there targets and back. So in short, the Israelis need American help, without it theres really not much they can do. Map of middle east Last edited by Rabs; January 20th, 2006 at 06:43. | |
| |
| | Post 37 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Well, how did they go about it in the Iraq strike? |
| |
| | Post 38 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 39 |
| Milforum Hitman | On that occasion (June 7, 1981) the Israeli AF strike force flew 680 miles across Jordan and Saudi Arabia and bombed the reactor. While it is supposed that the strike force evaded detection by flying so close to each other on the long journey that, instead of appearing as a squadron of small fighters on radar, they appeared as a single large jet, and not much attention was given to them, Rodger W.Claire's book, Raid on the Sun, lists this suggestion as a myth. I'm actually looking through my huge book on the Mossad right now, to see if there's something worth adding here. Update: Book says it was eight F-16's escorted by six interceptors F-15. Just like today with Iran, Israel got intelligence according to which Iraq was not trying to pursue nuclear ambitions for civilian purposes but for military purposes. In 1979 a Mossad commando had entered the French building in Southern France where the reactor was being built and they sabotaged the core of the reactor. Unfortunately the deal between Chirac and Saddam went on. In this occasion Jordan and Saudi Arabia (which were flown across for more than one hour) had not given Israel any permission and were caught by surprise. After the attack was successfully delivered the Arab world didn't protest too loud, which IMO meant they were not too happy about Saddam's plans. Hope I didn't hijack the thread, WD. [On tactical feasibility of Israeli strike on Iran see this (quote: "Israel could launch an airstrike or use its Jericho Missiles - 750 miles range. Or they can decide to use their three Dolphin submarines, or 5 now that they're purchased 2 more from Germany, able to launch nuclear missiles. The threat could consist of the use of bombs, such as the Gbuy-43/B with its 21 thousand lb, "micronukes" with a limited explosive power, though devastating"). It's in Italian but you can Babelfish the rest maybe. Feel free to ask me about what you don't understand].
__________________ "Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it". Pericles. ![]() Last edited by Italian Guy; January 20th, 2006 at 10:36. |
| |
| | Post 40 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Thank you IG very informative. |
| |