Topic: Tactical Feasibility of Israeli Strike on Iran 4

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
January 20th, 2006   Post 31
Insight
Banned
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabs
Maybe in a second wave but stealth aircarft and cruise missles will make up the majority of the strike package IMO.
Then you need some edumacation son. Israel does not have stealth aircraft nor cruise missiles. While you are entitled to your opinion, it is not a very informed one.

And if they could do it with cruise and stealth the first time around, why would there need to be a "second wave"? It's not that big an objective. If there was a second package, they'd prolly want some stand-off and stealth as well since the AD system will have time to gear up.

Sexy doesn't always mean smart.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 32
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
Then you need some edumacation son. Israel does not have stealth aircraft nor cruise missiles. While you are entitled to your opinion, it is not a very informed one.
I knew that "kiddo." I lost track of the thread and was referring to US capabilities.
__________________
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 33
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

I believe we know how the US would handle a strike. I'm wondering what options the isrelis have with no US millitary support.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 34
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
I'm wondering what options the isrelis have with no US millitary support.
Nothing.

They have no friendly skys to fly over and with syria sideing with Iran now. I just dont see how they would get to Iran regardless if they have the aircraft to carry out the strike.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 35
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

So you think the Israelis will just sit by and let Iran go nuclear?
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 36
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
So you think the Israelis will just sit by and let Iran go nuclear?
Not by choice no, Like you I am a big supporter of Israel but if no one lets them use there air space to attack Iran (including Iraq) theres just no way they can do it.

I just dont see the new Iraqi government or any middle eastern country letting the Iraelis use there air space for the fear of proveking another Iran-Iraq war. or fuel civil un-rest in their own countries for helping Israel out.

The only nations I could imagine allowing Israel to fly over would be Jordan because of its strong pro-west population and government and Iraq due to American pressure. Even then without US refueling capabilities the jets would never even have a shot of makeing it to there targets and back.

So in short, the Israelis need American help, without it theres really not much they can do.


Map of middle east

Last edited by Rabs; January 20th, 2006 at 06:43.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 37
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Well, how did they go about it in the Iraq strike?
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 38
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
Well, how did they go about it in the Iraq strike?
I was afraid you would ask that and I really dont know.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 39
Italian Guy
Milforum Hitman
 
 
Gear

On that occasion (June 7, 1981) the Israeli AF strike force flew 680 miles across Jordan and Saudi Arabia and bombed the reactor.
While it is supposed that the strike force evaded detection by flying so close to each other on the long journey that, instead of appearing as a squadron of small fighters on radar, they appeared as a single large jet, and not much attention was given to them, Rodger W.Claire's book, Raid on the Sun, lists this suggestion as a myth.
I'm actually looking through my huge book on the Mossad right now, to see if there's something worth adding here.

Update: Book says it was eight F-16's escorted by six interceptors F-15. Just like today with Iran, Israel got intelligence according to which Iraq was not trying to pursue nuclear ambitions for civilian purposes but for military purposes. In 1979 a Mossad commando had entered the French building in Southern France where the reactor was being built and they sabotaged the core of the reactor. Unfortunately the deal between Chirac and Saddam went on.
In this occasion Jordan and Saudi Arabia (which were flown across for more than one hour) had not given Israel any permission and were caught by surprise. After the attack was successfully delivered the Arab world didn't protest too loud, which IMO meant they were not too happy about Saddam's plans.
Hope I didn't hijack the thread, WD.

[On tactical feasibility of Israeli strike on Iran see this (quote: "Israel could launch an airstrike or use its Jericho Missiles - 750 miles range. Or they can decide to use their three Dolphin submarines, or 5 now that they're purchased 2 more from Germany, able to launch nuclear missiles. The threat could consist of the use of bombs, such as the Gbuy-43/B with its 21 thousand lb, "micronukes" with a limited explosive power, though devastating"). It's in Italian but you can Babelfish the rest maybe. Feel free to ask me about what you don't understand].
__________________
"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it".
Pericles.



Last edited by Italian Guy; January 20th, 2006 at 10:36.
 
January 20th, 2006   Post 40
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Thank you IG very informative.