![]() | About T-90 vs M1A2 Page 2 |
![]() |
| | #11 |
| | Having a range of some 5000 meters with the missile is nice but can you even see that far to start tracking targets or more importantly can you idenfity them. So what use is it really in a meeting engagement? Oh T-90 can jump wow! lol what? you're gonna jump over minefields or something? |
![]() | |
| |
| | #12 |
| |
The US is devopling Extended Range Munitions...... http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...itions/erm.htm \"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don\'t have that problem\". Ronald Reagan, President of the United States; 1985 |
| | #13 | |
| | Quote:
The part about the T-90 seriously lacking behined the abrams in terms of crew protection is true and I mentioned it before aswell. | |
| | #14 | |||||
| | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
| | #15 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #16 |
| |
the one issue i have with autoloaders is that they contain extra parts. more parts mean more things that can go wrong. i would prefer a manual load than auto for only that reason. even if it is slower, one jam on an autoloader can mean you are a sitting duck.
![]() si deum nobiscum, quis contra? AS LONG AS DIXIE STILL EXISTS,THIS COUNTRY WILL NEVER FALL |
| | #17 |
| |
Hundreds, if not thousands of moving parts on an auto loader, one part with a human loader. There are many stories out there about Abrams firing two shots in five seconds during the opening seconds of an engagement, that's huge in armored warfare, means they could make a huge dent in the enemy forces before they even had a chance to fire, and the auto-loader on the Iraqi tanks took 10 seconds to reload. That's an eternity when you have an enemy tank bearing down on you.
Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere. My City |
| | #18 |
| |
Try our new group about the might of the Russian military and tanks in Facebook. You are free to discuss anything about the might of Russia. Plz join Russian tanks and military.
|
| | #19 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #20 |
| |
I cant stand these "Tank VS Tank" threads, there just silly; tanks dont work alone, they' re supported by Mechanised Infantry, AA guns etc. Theres just too many different factors to determine which would win in a realistic, modern battle. But, I suppose in a 1 v 1 the T-90 simply because of its innate ATGM capability.
Last edited by DarkRain; October 24th, 2010 at 14:07.. |
![]() |