| |
| | Post 11 |
| Optio | But we don't know the circumstances in which or the level at which these people were "associated with a bad crowd". Just because a neighbour is making IEDs that doesn't mean the other guy is. Gitmo shows the US in a very bad light, we're supposed to be morally better than the terrorists, but whats the point when we're behaving like this? |
| |
| | Post 12 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | I have to agree with bulldogg. You are known by the company you keep. If you stand by and let bad things happen without hindering them then you are just as guilty as helping.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Jequirty, I understand your argument as I held it not long ago. Now I think differently. Good and evil are subjective terms. I consider myself a good Catholic but to Osama and his crew I am an evil Infidel. These people would not offer me anything as comfortable as Camp Delta were they to take me prisoner. These people offer me, my family, my friends, my neighbours and my countrymen two choices - convert or die. To think of applying the rights due me as a citizen of my country they wish to destroy along with all its institutions such as the legal system is laughable. Were we enemies fighting by the same rules sure, but that aint the game they brought to the table. In my opinion summary executions were only foregone to obtain intelligence. This enemy would cut your head off live on the internet if given the chance and people bemoan that we aren't giving them a trial?? Screw them.
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| |
| | Post 14 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
They werent picked off WALKING in the desert or streets. They were taken into CUSTODY of coalition forces carrying weapons. That is a big difference. They should be kept there until the war on terrorism is over. Last edited by phoenix80; June 15th, 2006 at 07:05. | |
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Optio | Yeah, i understand your argument too bulldogg, but we have our justice system, they have theirs. Ours is much fairer and delivers proper justice where else theirs is, to put it crudely, complete bollocks. Thats what makes us morally better (And stops the hippies crying. In theory.) and gives us the high ground. If we don't keep that high ground, people around the globe will soon be unable to determine who are the good guys and who are the bad guys in this war on terror which will only encourage more attacks on the boys on the ground. Also, without a trial, how can anyone determine whether this people held are actually guilty? There seems to be a lack of common sense somewhere. A fair trial for each of them will determine whether they're actually bad guys, if they are then punish them accordingly but what happens if some of those guys were just in the wrong place at the wrong time? No-one can really say for sure unless there are trials held. I just don't think this will help America in the long run and the whole deal is pretty shady, but thats my two cents done and dusted |
| |
| | Post 16 | |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | Quote:
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill | |
| |
| | Post 17 |
| Banned ![]() | I'm glad it has been explained to me that these suicides were probably an act of assymetric warfare. I had this slight inclination that they may have been depressed. My confusion is now over. Enemy combatants. Still waiting for trials. War on terrorism to go on for decades. Will they ever be released? "Gitmo" is becoming one of the best sources of propaganda that the terrorists have ever had. |
| |
| | Post 18 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | You want them released in your neighborhood? |
| |
| | Post 19 |
| Optio | http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5102528.stm "The US 'wants to end Guantanamo' US President George W Bush has said he understands European concerns over the US prison at Guantanamo Bay and he "would like it to end". Mr Bush pledged to send detainees back to their home countries, but added that the outcome must not result in freeing "people who can do us harm". The comments came after talks with EU leaders at a one-day summit in Vienna. Leaders also discussed trade, global energy security, climate change, Iraq and the Iranian nuclear crisis." Nice one |
| |
| | Post 20 |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | I want Gitmo to stand as a fate worse than death and that's exactly what it is to most "terrorists." They are in a place that they earned, who are we to take that away from them. And as for suicides, what is that to them except that they can't take others with them with a suicide belt? |
| |