Strange thing I have noticed at both the DNC and the RNC

About Strange thing I have noticed at both the DNC and the RNC Page 4


  International Military Forums > The Off-Topic Zone > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
September 5th, 2008   #31
WNxRogue
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
Well, for the sake of making an ass out of myself, I'm going to go ahead and assume that there were probably a strong number of Democrats there, just my opinion though, not like it matters anyway.
You my good sir, never back off of a mistake do you? Assuming is not good, it leads to mistakes and to problems. Better to be sure before you say something.

Quote:
And you're right, the party in power DOES tend to have more people against them... An unfortunate byproduct of the electoral process... But just because they didn't do the best job doesn't mean people can be more violent in a protest... That's against the law.
True, and I certainly am against violent protests like that. But I also would try and be sure who it is that need to be punished, and not assume on who it is and take action from there.


"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
 
September 5th, 2008   #32
Rob Henderson
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WNxRogue
You my good sir, never back off of a mistake do you? Assuming is not good, it leads to mistakes and to problems. Better to be sure before you say something.
And that's why I said "at the risk of making an ass of myself." It was a bit of a joke... Only saying that there were probably a lot of Democrats there... And I'd be willing to wager that if we could figure out how many there were, I'd be right.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WNxRogue
True, and I certainly am against violent protests like that. But I also would try and be sure who it is that need to be punished, and not assume on who it is and take action from there.
They did figure out who needed to be punished... Police don't know party lines... (Aside from Luis) They only arrested those in violation of the law.



EDIT: I must retract the statement about police.... Check out AikiRooster's post here... "FOP Endorses McCain."

And laugh at the irony. It's ok. I did too. Hahaha.

Last edited by Rob Henderson; September 5th, 2008 at 22:16..
 
September 6th, 2008   #33
A Can of Man
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Other Guy
When you count into the fact that there are 72 million registered democrats it looks a little smaller.
Yes but 72 million of them didn't show up now did they?
 
September 6th, 2008   #34
Rob Henderson
 
 
^^^ That too....
 
September 7th, 2008   #35
major liability
 
 
Well, those protesting the Republicans have much, much better and more numerous reasons to be angry.

I think it's a joke anyways, we need protests like the ones that scared Washington back during Viet Nam to make any real changes.

But that's not possible these days; they'll either herd you into a chain link cage called a "Free Speech Zone" (oh, the irony) or spray you with mace and throw you in jail.


"Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." - George Washington
 
September 7th, 2008   #36
The Other Guy
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
Well, those protesting the Republicans have much, much better and more numerous reasons to be angry.

I think it's a joke anyways, we need protests like the ones that scared Washington back during Viet Nam to make any real changes.

But that's not possible these days; they'll either herd you into a chain link cage called a "Free Speech Zone" (oh, the irony) or spray you with mace and throw you in jail.
Well said.


I'm the bleeding heart liberal your mother warned you about.
 
September 7th, 2008   #37
Rob Henderson
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
Well, those protesting the Republicans have much, much better and more numerous reasons to be angry.

I think it's a joke anyways, we need protests like the ones that scared Washington back during Viet Nam to make any real changes.

But that's not possible these days; they'll either herd you into a chain link cage called a "Free Speech Zone" (oh, the irony) or spray you with mace and throw you in jail.
George Bush isn't running for president last time I checked... It's John McCain and Sarah Palin. They don't deserve to be protested like that. March on the White House if you want to, but do't do it to the new people just because they're in the same party...
 
September 8th, 2008   #38
WNxRogue
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
George Bush isn't running for president last time I checked... It's John McCain and Sarah Palin. They don't deserve to be protested like that. March on the White House if you want to, but do't do it to the new people just because they're in the same party...
Or voted 90% of the same?
 
September 8th, 2008   #39
mmarsh
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
George Bush isn't running for president last time I checked... It's John McCain and Sarah Palin. They don't deserve to be protested like that. March on the White House if you want to, but do't do it to the new people just because they're in the same party...
John McCain has publically bragged that he has supported BUSH 95% of the time. Its even on Youtube. His record indicates a 90% agreement of Bush policies. Mrs Palin views are even more extreme that McCains.

Therefore its totally acceptable to equate the two as being a continuation of the Bush Doctrine.


"My center is giving way, my right is in retreat situation excellent. I shall attack." -Foch

I am from NYC. I fly a French flag because I work in Paris.
 
September 8th, 2008   #40
A Can of Man
 
 
They do have the right to protest as they are right: if McCain is elected there probably won't be any huge changes, at least not in the beginning.
However, beating up cops and doing the typical "ohhh look at us, we're anarchists" stuff really has to go.