| |
Topic: Statue of Major Robert Rogers, father of Rangers angers vets |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| |
| | Post 1 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Post; Statue of Major Robert Rogers, father of Rangers angers vetsIt is not everyday that something that has to do with history makes it into the news. It seems that NY is honoring Major Robert Rogers, the father of the US Army Rangers, this Memorial Day. Major Rogers fought well during the Indian campaigns but fought for the British during the American Revolution What do you all think? FORT EDWARD, N.Y. - Maj. Robert Rogers, the frontiersman whose 18th century manual on guerrilla warfare has become a blueprint for Army Ranger fighting tactics, is getting what some consider a long-overdue honor: a statue in his memory. But some veterans believe unveiling the monument on Memorial Day is insensitive because Rogers was loyal to England during the Revolutionary War. "I think it's a travesty that we would think about honoring a person, especially someone who fought against us, on that day," said Bob Bearor, who served in the Army's 101st Airborne Division in the 1960s. "It's a sacred day. ... Let's honor our dead who died for our country." The life-size bronze statue is scheduled to be unveiled during a ceremony on Rogers Island in the Hudson River, 40 miles north of Albany. The island served as the base camp for Rogers' Rangers during the late 1750s, when the British and French fought for control of North America. REAM MORE
__________________ "The best form of taking care of troops is first-class training, for this saves unnecessary casualties." Erwin Rommel |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | if he hadn`t of fought in the french-indian wars and won would there be an america ?
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Optio | What alot of people tend to forget about the American Revolution was that it was as much a civil war as anything else. Many Americans sided with the British. I see it as something similar to having a statue to a Confederate and think it is well and good that they are doing so. In Vermont, Rogers is still remembered for his actions here. However, I can sympathise with the vets who dislike the timing of the statue's dedication. Memorial Day should be only for those who served this country.
__________________ A M O R ~ V I N C I T ~ O M N I A \"Love Conquers Everything\" - Horace http://earlyamerica.com/molly_pitcher.html |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | I agree with Molly. It seems that another day would be more appropriate. ![]() Major Robert Rogers http://www.benning.army.mil/rtb/Hall...ert_rogers.htm
__________________ "I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier." To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post. |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Optio | This is just a case of bad timing. I am also sure though, that there would be some sort of protest or negative sentiment from some veterans for commissioning the statue in the first place since he fought against our constitution. So I guess, maybe not on our Memorial Day, but could have happened any day and someone would have a problem with it. |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Optio | Quote:
__________________ \"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.\" \"I\'ve suffered just so I could return harder\" - Gangstarr Semper Fi | |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Milites Gregarius | My opinion is since h fought for the British in the American Revolution he shouldn't be honored that day, i agree that it is inappropriate timing |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Optio | Sort of surprising to see that Fort Benning is not in an uproar about this. |
| |
| | Post 9 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Quote:
He was a hero in the French & Indian War, but was on the wrong side of history in the Revolution. As a former batt boy, I was fine with it. | |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Seeing that he is the father of the Regiment, and it must be one of the oldest Military Units in America and that they are still carrying the name that he gave them, then why not a statue, if the former members find this so offensives then why carry on with the name that he gave them. Surely it would better for them to seek a new title to get away from the man that formed and named them and cosign the name to the history books |
| |