Topic: Soviet Superweapon used vs CHina in the 60s 2

Charge 7 · February 11th, 2005

No, he was replying to Goose's comment about communism and brotherhood.

Zucchini · February 11th, 2005

When one country negotiates away another country's vital interests to a common enemy, you are going to risk a split no matter what the form of government.

China had a hot border dispute with India, and, without consulting with China, Kruschev pulled the rug out from under them. He basically treated China like a child instead of a full partner, and the Chinese did not take it well. So they chilled relationships with Russia.

Missileer · February 11th, 2005

The only weapon in the late 60's would be a neutron bomb explosion that could devastate an island with low radiation effects. IMO.

victortsoi · February 11th, 2005

LOL!
im the guy that started that strategypage thread, im Achtunglagg on that site btw.
i didnt get satisfactory responses there so i asked you guys.
probably some skirmish that got elaborated on a lot.

Sexybeast · February 12th, 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charge_7

"about the communist idology, it was mainly because of kuschreav, wutever the h**l his name is, after stalin"

Wrong. Stalinism was the first major corruption of communist ideals. It was already twisted from what Marx and Engels had envisioned by Lenin, but Stalin totally bent it out of any similarity to anything like what "Das Capital" was about. Khrushchev was actually a reformer in comparison to Stalin. After the missles of October he became more and more increasingly willing to negotiate with the West and that is why Breshnev and the politburo kicked him out of power.

and also his crappy agricultural policies

Sexybeast · February 12th, 2005

actually china captured a T-62 tank in that boarder clashes, and that tank is still in the museum today

MadeInChina · February 12th, 2005

" you will not retreat or u'll be fed to geramans" -khusrkev

lol, he is not a good politican, as far as i know hes a read hard-edger, capable of driving men to the limits, but hes not intelligent

victortsoi · February 12th, 2005

lol, my father also told me that when he was in the college for civil engineering the leading civil engineer was put into a mental hospital for daring to tell khrustchev that his plan of making two dams on one river was wrong....

Damien435 · February 12th, 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by victortsoi

lol, my father also told me that when he was in the college for civil engineering the leading civil engineer was put into a mental hospital for daring to tell khrustchev that his plan of making two dams on one river was wrong....

lol, he should have been, in my state alone we have four dams on the Missourri River, construction on these dams started in the 40's and were completed in the early 60's.

Missileer · February 12th, 2005

The only reason for multiple dams is for navigation of locks up and down the river. Lock #26 on the Mississippi is located near St. Louis. There are a lot more downriver.

February 11th, 2005	Post 11
Charge 7 Master Gunner	No, he was replying to Goose's comment about communism and brotherhood. __________________ "Do not forget your dogs of war, your big guns, which are the most-to-be respected arguments of the rights of kings." - Frederick the Great, King of Prussia

February 11th, 2005	Post 13
Missileer Nuclear Duck Hunter Gear	The only weapon in the late 60's would be a neutron bomb explosion that could devastate an island with low radiation effects. IMO. __________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill

February 12th, 2005	Post 17
MadeInChina Primus Pilus	" you will not retreat or u'll be fed to geramans" -khusrkev lol, he is not a good politican, as far as i know hes a read hard-edger, capable of driving men to the limits, but hes not intelligent __________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too.

February 11th, 2005	Post 12
Zucchini Optio	When one country negotiates away another country's vital interests to a common enemy, you are going to risk a split no matter what the form of government. China had a hot border dispute with India, and, without consulting with China, Kruschev pulled the rug out from under them. He basically treated China like a child instead of a full partner, and the Chinese did not take it well. So they chilled relationships with Russia.

February 11th, 2005	Post 14
victortsoi Milites Gregarius	LOL! im the guy that started that strategypage thread, im Achtunglagg on that site btw. i didnt get satisfactory responses there so i asked you guys. probably some skirmish that got elaborated on a lot.

February 12th, 2005	Post 16
Sexybeast Banned	actually china captured a T-62 tank in that boarder clashes, and that tank is still in the museum today

February 12th, 2005	Post 18
victortsoi Milites Gregarius	lol, my father also told me that when he was in the college for civil engineering the leading civil engineer was put into a mental hospital for daring to tell khrustchev that his plan of making two dams on one river was wrong....

February 12th, 2005	Post 20
Missileer Nuclear Duck Hunter Gear	The only reason for multiple dams is for navigation of locks up and down the river. Lock #26 on the Mississippi is located near St. Louis. There are a lot more downriver.