Slow learners

koalaburger

Active member
Some events in wars keep being repeated with nothing learnt or changed. The ones I am thinking of are:

1. How many times did the germans have to invade through the Ardenne before the allies realised it was possible.

2. The bombing of Stalingrad, Monte Cassino Monastery and Caen after D Day showed that all that was achieved was to give excellent cover for streetfighting defenders and to block streets to vehicles. They still continued doing it.

Any additions welcome.
 
How about, the bombing of civilian populations does little more than harden their resolve to fight on.
 
The fact that ignoring what a country is doing in a military way doesn't mean it goes away. This is still the case in the modern day with some countries.
 
How about, the bombing of civilian populations does little more than harden their resolve to fight on.

The Poles were massively scared after German Aircraft destroyed parts of Warsaw in 1939.

Also I'm sure the Maginot Line was to be extended to cover the Belgian border but the world was having quite a depression there so the French Republic lacked the funds to extend it.
 
It is the civilians that make the weapons of war, with out them the war grinds to halt. Area bombing made sure you destroyed as much as possible of the enemies capability to carry on fighting
 
Really then explain why German AFV production went from around 500 in 1939 to almost 19000 in 1944 and aircraft production went from 2000 in 1939 to 35000 in 1944?
 
monty, you are right there; Decentralization worked, even though the area bomb period, it had the "hardening" effect described, and - while it destroyed infrastructure for the civilians to an unknown before extent - did not really harm production numbers.

Production was much more influenced by denial of critical materials.

Rattler
 
monty, you are right there; Decentralization worked, even though the area bomb period, it had the "hardening" effect described, and - while it destroyed infrastructure for the civilians to an unknown before extent - did not really harm production numbers.

Production was much more influenced by denial of critical materials.

Rattler

Exactly even in 1945 German production was on track to match 1944 which was pretty impressive given the resource and territorial losses they had sustained by 1945, this is not the sign of a country bombed into submission.

The simple reality is that area bombing was a failure for the Luftwaffe in 1940-41 and it was a failure for the RAF from 1943-1945 and given the manpower lost in these exercises it was an almost criminal failure, Harris should have learnt from the failure of the London blitz but he was too busy extracting revenge no matter what the cost.
 
Try working on the fact they about 4 million slaves working in their factories drawn from all over Europe. Also that they built underground factories and work from small sheds all over the country. By the end of the war production was down to a trickle as nearly every bit of infrastructure had been smashed.
 
Last edited:
Some events in wars keep being repeated with nothing learnt or changed. The ones I am thinking of are:

1. How many times did the germans have to invade through the Ardenne before the allies realised it was possible.

2. The bombing of Stalingrad, Monte Cassino Monastery and Caen after D Day showed that all that was achieved was to give excellent cover for streetfighting defenders and to block streets to vehicles. They still continued doing it.

Any additions welcome.

3. The Eleven Battles of Isonzo, June 1915 - September 1917. Eleven offensives that involved about the half of the Italian Army strenght each, caused houndreds of thousands casualties, worn out Army's materials and moral and gained onfy a few miles of spoiled land in total. No one, including the King, ever criticized General Cadorna (chief of staff), who had nearly dictatorial powers and was in total and absolute control of the whole country at war. Strange enough, after showing his dumb incompetence for over two years, he performed surprisingly well at managing the retreat after the collapse at the Twelveth Battle, saving the Army before Allied forces could be operative in support.
 
I have always felt that the bombing caused the Germans to take a lot of 88's off the front line for Ack ack defence of cities. A fair few troops as well. I have no figures so I wonder whether the numbers made it a significant effect on the front line battles.
 
There were over a million people involved in Ack Ack Batteries through out Germany trying to beat off the attacks from the air. This was the only second front we could affect until we were strong enough to cross the channel. By the time Allies had landed in Normady the German air force had been greatly reduced to a fraction of what it had been.
 
I am not saying that the bombing of Germany was uncalled for nor am I saying it had no effect on their war effort I am saying that the bombing of civilian populations as a method of altering the war effort and demoralising the populace failed just as it did in China and Britain earlier.

If you analyse the effectiveness of the USAF's campaign over Germany against that of the RAF you will see that American attempts at precision bombing had a far greater effect on German combat efficiency than that of the RAF.
 
In 1942 the RAF found that most of their bombs were falling up to five miles away from their target, so they went over to area bombing. By 1944 with airborne radar and radio positioning they could drop their bombs on any area the size of a tennis court in Germany.
The bombing by the Americans altough courages was also a form of area bombing as each plane did not line up to drop its bombs, they watched the bomb leader and the group would all then drop their bombs, hoping to plaster the whole area. If the bomb leader got it wrong then so did every other plane.
 
Exactly even in 1945 German production was on track to match 1944 which was pretty impressive it was a failure for the RAF from 1943-1945 and given the manpower lost in these exercises it was an almost criminal failure
While some places the bombing did slow down certain forms of production (oil, etc.), many other areas it did not help much because it forced the Germans to moved their centralized production to many small production faciclities spread over a large area.
Do you feel the convoy system across the Altantic Ocean was a waste of manpower? Shipping goods by convoys was far more costly in human lives and material than the air bombing campaign!
It was a British economist that first proposed to the RAF, that to destroy seven large railroad choke points would be the most effective way to hurt German war production. The bombing that hurt the Germans the most, was the crippling of the railroad infrastructure! The result was many Me-262s were produced but, could not be mated to the many engines that had been produced but, had no way to shipped the engines to where they were needed the most, at the airfields. There are many examples of this type of problem once the railroads were no longer effective.
Bombers were used as bait! Bait to get the Luftwaffe fighters to come up and fight the Allied escort fighters. If the Allied fighters went down to strife enemy airfields, many experienced Allied fighter pilots would get shot down by flak. (Only a few USAAF 'aces' were shot down by Luftwaffe fighters, all the rest were shot down by flak!) Killing the Luftwaffe in the air prevented the Luftwaffe from being a problem on D-Day or the days after that.

Harris should have learnt from the failure of the London blitz but he was too busy extracting revenge no matter what the cost.
The failure of the Luftwaffe in its efforts to defeat the RAF, was not that they attempted to destroy the RAF but rather, the lack of intelligence and many tactical mistakes.
The efforts to destroy the radar stations and quit before eliminating enough radar stations to put a real hole in the detection network. Destroying the airfields and then stopped before that task was complete. Resulted in the RAF remained an effective fighting unit.

If you analyse the effectiveness of the USAF's campaign over Germany against that of the RAF you will see that American attempts at precision bombing had a far greater effect on German combat efficiency than that of the RAF.
Yes, the USAAF was a little more accurate and.... they paid a higher price in aircraft and air crew losses.

Also keep in mind, until the invasion in North Africa, later Sicily and, Normandy.... there were many days when the Western Allies did nothing to take the pressure of the Russians fighting on the eastern front other than the air campaign!
 
Now why does every one only quote the Bomber raids in Europe, what about the bombing raids on Japan. They where far more deadly than any thing that went on in Europe.
 
Back
Top