Topic: Should Women Be In The Military? 31

Stripesgamer.com


Click Here to Join us Today!
FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Should Women Be In The Military?
No Way! 5 2.29%
Not On The Field 51 23.39%
As Nurse, Yes 15 6.88%
Let Them Have A Go 16 7.34%
Sure, Why not? 55 25.23%
Hell Yeah! 46 21.10%
Yeah, We Need More Women As Leaders 30 13.76%
Voters: 218. You may not vote on this poll

 
March 8th, 2006   Post 301
Mohmar Deathstrike
Banned
 
 
Gear



Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
Also, in the book Starship Troopers (not sure if it's true or has been disproved), they say the average male is stronger and faster, but average females have better reflexes and g-endurance, which would seem to make them better fighter pilots and such.
Yeah, see, there's a reason why they put the 'fiction'-part in 'science fiction'.

Either way, I'd say that any individual meeting physical and psychological requirements should be allowed to do any task.
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 302
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

yeah?!
__________________

- Ready To Strike -
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 303
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohmar Deathstrike
Either way, I'd say that any individual meeting physical and psychological requirements should be allowed to do any task.
Regardless of how it may affect the overrall mission? By that standard, the individual and their own desires become more important than the group. That isn't healthy or wise in the military.


__________________
Ugh.
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 304
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Well, sometimes, when a female is in the group, it may add a physcological mindset
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 305
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
March 8th, 2006   Post 306
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
Unit cohesiveness, a biggie.

Fundamental differences in males and females, anatomically.

Male and female 18 year olds working extremely close together.

Having to rework logistics to include female needs.

...I can think of a lot of reasons. But like I said in another post, women should only be excluded from most combat arms positions. Support is fine.

 
March 9th, 2006   Post 307
FO Seaman
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
It's bad enough seeing a wounded "male" comrade, but it may lead to even worse psycological damage seeing a wounded "female" comrade. I have no problem with females serving in a more relaxed setting like they currently do, but having them in combat and front line units maybe a miss take. It's proven that males will more willingly protect female comrades and will linger around the female wounded, Israel tryed it.
__________________


 
March 9th, 2006   Post 308
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Cadet Seaman...If you get into combat you will see men, women and children blown to bits, along with your friends. You either learn to live with it or go nuts.
 
March 9th, 2006   Post 309
Mohmar Deathstrike
Banned
 
 
Gear



Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ24
Regardless of how it may affect the overrall mission? By that standard, the individual and their own desires become more important than the group. That isn't healthy or wise in the military.


Then how about having all-female and all-male combat units?
 
March 9th, 2006   Post 310
FO Seaman
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Cadet Seaman...If you get into combat you will see men, women and children blown to bits, along with your friends. You either learn to live with it or go nuts.
Yes, but did you live with those people for two years, go throught hell on earth with them, or watch over them at night?