| |
June 25th, 2006
| Post 1 |
| Primus Pilus | Post; Should violent expression be restricted?violent expression is used increasingly in all fields today. I don't think complete censorship is necessary to works. It's because fascinating works exists a lot even if it's violent. But I'm convinced. Censorship certain degree of is necessary. But where should boundary line be set up? How do yout think about? |
|
|
June 25th, 2006
| Post 2 |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter  | Depends on where the violence is expressed. If its in a bullring in Mexico or a heavyweight boxing match, it's totally in place. If someone tries either sport on you at work, then he deserves the butt stroke that gets from Security, where I work, they take no prisoners.
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2006
| Post 3 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Humans can be violent. It is impossible to restrict violence by its very nature.
__________________ "It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it." - George Washington |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2006
| Post 4 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius  | This is a very shady area! You could make a certain set of rules, but you'll never get a consensus with this. To some, the rules might be to restrictive while others would like to see more censorship.... My personal opinion is that the "everything should be possible" mentality has caused a serious drift in values and morals. When I look around I see many things which are ready to be put down. Not just violence, but a whole arena of stupid, senseless and moronic things.... Wow, did I just sound like a 19th century preacher?
__________________ A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
June 27th, 2006
| Post 5 | |
| Banned  | Quote:
| |
|
|
