Topic: Shooting Civies? 3

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
July 9th, 2005   Post 21
Redneck
Buttercup
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
Really. Did you know a 2LT died on the MOUT site? Did you know a role player was injured by a smoke grenade, and had 33 stiches? Getting smacked in the head with a 5.56mm SIM round isn't fun. I was just comparing the "REAL THING" with the training.

You are a 17 year old kid talking to a group that includes many combat veterans. Sometimes it is better to sit back and listen to those who know rather than try to impress someone with what you think you do. In fact that is a good idea ALL the time.

Stay on topic, this side discussion ends now.
__________________
No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen.
 
July 9th, 2005   Post 22
WARmachine88
Banned
 
just let those reporters who critisize this marine to go into Iraq, carry a gun, tell them insurgents like to pretend to die and hit you in the back, and tell them go into a building and search for insurgents

and we shall see what they do
 
July 9th, 2005   Post 23
chewie_nz
Banned
 
there are a select few of comabt reporters who do just more than that.

try walking into a combat zone with nothing more than a camera and a blue flak jacket to protect you. THAT's a different kind of bravery
 
July 9th, 2005   Post 24
WARmachine88
Banned
 
if they know how much dangers a soldier has to face and how much pressure he has to endure during the decision making, the reporter should really think twice before critisizing this marine's choice.
 
July 9th, 2005   Post 25
chewie_nz
Banned
 
follow the link i posted and you can read that combat journalists own opinion and judge for yourself.
 
July 10th, 2005   Post 26
:Brad:
Milites Gregarius
 
Guys sorry about all this mess didnt think it would turn into a fight.Also the topic should be called shooting wounded Insurgents, once againe im sorry.
__________________
Brad.B
 
July 11th, 2005   Post 27
FO Seaman
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

REMOVED, pay attention to the warnings, they are not there for the sake of looking good.
__________________
F.O. Seaman
CAP/USAFAUX DoA/DHS
Administration Officer
Golden Armor Composite Squadron, 15077
Fort Knox, Kentucky 40121

 
July 11th, 2005   Post 28
greenarmy1980
Optio
 
 
Journalists should really be screened prior to attending any military event in my opinion
 
July 11th, 2005   Post 29
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Green, I am curious. Could you go a little further with that line of thought. In what way are you thinking they should be screened and for what benefit? I know how you feel about imbedded whiners, erm, I mean, reporters so I would like to hear your thoughts in a little more detail here.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
July 11th, 2005   Post 30
greenarmy1980
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenarmy1980
Journalists should really be screened prior to attending any military event in my opinion

Journalists should go through the same Etnac screening. They are privy to Operational knowledge of what units that they are reporting on are doing. Why not make all of them have to go through a security screening so that way they will be able to process and maybe even better understand what they can inform the people at home without endangering the troops. Also some of them go absolutely nuts when they get shot at. If they will not allow soldiers to be deployed if they are prescribed medication for mental problems, why do they allow reporters to be deployed when if they do not get their medication they go Schizo or what not at the most unopportune time.