| |
| | Post 41 | |
| Milites Gregarius | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 42 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | heres another important question, at this time do the Russians have an oprational aircraft carrier.
__________________ ^_^ |
| |
| | Post 43 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
__________________ Honour.... Courage.... Commitment US Naval Academy \"Non sibi sed patriae!\" (Not for self, but country) US Navy | |
| |
| | Post 44 |
| Primus Pilus | there is one operational carrier in the russian navy at the moment.
__________________ Flavius Vegetius Renatus De Rei Militari - Let him who desires peace prepare for war. Hard work doesn't guarantee success, but without it you don't have a chance. - Alex Rodriguez (Go Yankees!) |
| |
| | Post 45 |
| No Chance Outside | Yup the Kusnetsov. But back on topic, no it's not even close to being on par with a US Nimitz class carrier.
__________________ I don't exist. TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED ![]() Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
| |
| | Post 46 |
| Primus Pilus | the link said that carrier was sold to India |
| |
| | Post 47 | |
| Primus Pilus | it said there was an unsuccessful attempt to sell it to india. Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 48 |
| No Chance Outside | Sad ain't it? |
| |
| | Post 49 |
| Primus Pilus | well i have a feeling it might have more to do with the funding needed to keep the carrier afloat then it being a poorly designed ship. i'm not completely familiar with the Royal Navy, but wouldn't it compare somewhat to the Invincible Class carriers? |
| |
| | Post 50 |
| No Chance Outside | look! One more person has voted for the Kusnetsov. After everything I posted, I think it's fair to say it's ridiculous. Stone vs Bow and Arrow... so if it's a Russian stone it'll beat the American bow and arrow right? |
| |