Topic: Roman Army : What Made this Army Great.

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > General Military History Forum
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Romans: Great or Not Great?
Tony the Tiger Great! 18 78.26%
Well, Sort of Great! 3 13.04%
Ive Seen Better Soldiers in my Toy Box! 2 8.70%
Well Better than Nothing 0 0%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

 
June 3rd, 2004   Post 1
Mark Conley
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 

Post; Roman Army : What Made this Army Great.


We seem to be stuck in the 20th century...and I know that there was more to military history than WW I and WW II.

The new subject to talk about is the Roman Army. Just what was it about the Roman army that enabled it to take over just about all of the known world, and hold it for almost 400 Years?

Get them brains working in another direction folks. Oh yes...

My slant on the Romans? They had an organized salary system for the soldiers, with an actual retirement with pay for their loyal service! Non-eroding benefits! Thats what made em great!

__________________
“If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 2
1217
Primus Pilus
 

Post; Re: Roman Army : What Made this Army Great.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Conley
They had an organized salary system for the soldiers, with an actual retirement with pay for their loyal service! Non-eroding benefits! Thats what made em great!
That's part of it. I think discipline and professionalism were the keys. They had better tactics then anyone around at that time. That's another ting you need to be great, no one that's greater then you are....
__________________
"It is not supreme excellence to fight and conquer in all your battles,
It is supreme excellence if you break the enemy's resistance without fighting."
Sun Tzu, the Art of War
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 3
Animal Mother
Optio
 
Which Roman army? Pre or post the Marius reforms? The post Marius reforms was an excellent army, uniformly equipped with armour, weapons, etc.

Must have been an impressive, and fearsome, sight for most oponents where perhaps only chieftains had that kind of gear, to face an army where everyone carry sutch kit.
__________________
Tanknet - Military Forum.
\"Blackburn finally got to make a plane the way they wanted to, they got a solid block of aluminium and drilled holes in it\".
Comment on the Blackburn Buccaneer.
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 4
xopxe1
Milites Gregarius
 
 
another factor that made them great - training - the only army of that time that I know in which the recruits were trained to fight before they get into battle - also the legions carried out trainings in the camps.
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 5
xopxe1
Milites Gregarius
 
 
also the organized command during battles - romans won mostly due to the organized conduct of battle IMO - the most other armies they met were the kind to which tactics were unknown concept and whose commanders just throw their men into the fight and hoped they'll win by bigger numbers.
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 6
bush musketeer
Optio
 
 

Post; romans


the fact they had good armour, they used all there service arms in harmony with each other.
and they would take in good fighters from previous enemys to use as axuillary troops.
also they were well trained.
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 7
IrishWizard
Optio
 
They were greatly organized when it came to battle. Other than the typical way nations use to fight, just charge at each other in large groups and hope for the best, they invented regiments and fought orderly. This is what made them so great. Also how they held nothing back, you dare speak against Rome, they used everything in their power to kill you.
 
June 4th, 2004   Post 8
xopxe1
Milites Gregarius
 
 
yeah, quality equipment added great to what was the roman army - their standard heavy infantry was what the german heavy panzers were during WW2
P.S> my most liked piece of equipmwent of the roman legioner is the spear ( or was it javelin?!) after throwing them the enemy lines had to continue fighting mostly without shields
 
June 7th, 2004   Post 9
Gunner13
Centurion
 
 
Gear

I think we have hit all the big ones (at least for the post Marius Army - these guys were professional, full time soldiers, not militia):

Discipline - absolute control by the centurions over their troops
Organization - flexible system of cohorts was much better than the old maniple system.
Combined Arms - infantry, cavalry, archers, engineers and artillery.
Tactics - much better than anyone else's.
Equipment - superior gear (arms and armor) thoughout the Late Republic and Imperial period until late in the Army's history. xopxe1, the weapon you refer to is the Pilum, which was more of a javelin than a spear. The Roman Army did make use of spears on more than one occasion, which is the Hasta or thrusting spear.

The Romans just did it better than anyone else.
__________________
"Americans are so hard to fight because they do not know their doctrine, and if they do, they do not feel compelled to follow it" - Unknown, but attributed to a Soviet Officer.

Mortui Non Mordent - Pro Libertate Patriae - Celeritas Et Accuratio
 
June 7th, 2004   Post 10
1217
Primus Pilus
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner13
I thinkThe Roman's just did it better than anyone else.
And that's the real key to winning wars. (Or winning anything for that matter... )