![]() | About Roman Army : What Made this Army Great. |
![]() |
| | #1 |
| | Roman Army : What Made this Army Great. infoThe new subject to talk about is the Roman Army. Just what was it about the Roman army that enabled it to take over just about all of the known world, and hold it for almost 400 Years? Get them brains working in another direction folks. Oh yes... My slant on the Romans? They had an organized salary system for the soldiers, with an actual retirement with pay for their loyal service! Non-eroding benefits! Thats what made em great! “If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF |
![]() | |
| |
| | #2 | |
| | Re: Roman Army : What Made this Army Great. infoQuote:
"It is not supreme excellence to fight and conquer in all your battles, It is supreme excellence if you break the enemy's resistance without fighting." Sun Tzu, the Art of War | |
| | #3 |
| |
Which Roman army? Pre or post the Marius reforms? The post Marius reforms was an excellent army, uniformly equipped with armour, weapons, etc. Must have been an impressive, and fearsome, sight for most oponents where perhaps only chieftains had that kind of gear, to face an army where everyone carry sutch kit. Tanknet - Military Forum. \"Blackburn finally got to make a plane the way they wanted to, they got a solid block of aluminium and drilled holes in it\". Comment on the Blackburn Buccaneer. |
| | #4 |
| |
another factor that made them great - training - the only army of that time that I know in which the recruits were trained to fight before they get into battle - also the legions carried out trainings in the camps.
|
| | #5 |
| |
also the organized command during battles - romans won mostly due to the organized conduct of battle IMO - the most other armies they met were the kind to which tactics were unknown concept and whose commanders just throw their men into the fight and hoped they'll win by bigger numbers.
|
| | #6 |
| | romans info
the fact they had good armour, they used all there service arms in harmony with each other. and they would take in good fighters from previous enemys to use as axuillary troops. also they were well trained. |
| | #7 |
| |
They were greatly organized when it came to battle. Other than the typical way nations use to fight, just charge at each other in large groups and hope for the best, they invented regiments and fought orderly. This is what made them so great. Also how they held nothing back, you dare speak against Rome, they used everything in their power to kill you.
|
| | #8 |
| |
yeah, quality equipment added great to what was the roman army - their standard heavy infantry was what the german heavy panzers were during WW2 P.S> my most liked piece of equipmwent of the roman legioner is the spear ( or was it javelin?!) after throwing them the enemy lines had to continue fighting mostly without shields |
| | #9 |
| |
I think we have hit all the big ones (at least for the post Marius Army - these guys were professional, full time soldiers, not militia): Discipline - absolute control by the centurions over their troops Organization - flexible system of cohorts was much better than the old maniple system. Combined Arms - infantry, cavalry, archers, engineers and artillery. Tactics - much better than anyone else's. Equipment - superior gear (arms and armor) thoughout the Late Republic and Imperial period until late in the Army's history. xopxe1, the weapon you refer to is the Pilum, which was more of a javelin than a spear. The Roman Army did make use of spears on more than one occasion, which is the Hasta or thrusting spear. The Romans just did it better than anyone else. I'd rather be a Soldier with a mule and mountain gun, than Knight of old, with spurs of gold, or Roman, Greek or Hun. For when there's trouble brewing, they always send for me! Mortui Non Mordent - Celeritas Et Accuratio |
| | #10 | |
| | Quote:
| |
![]() |