| |
March 26th, 2005
| Post 61 |
| Tirones | Our Chinese aren't warlike! 40 years ago,western countrys so feared that we controled the secret of citybuster.but time proved that we only use it to protect world peace. we never use it or even threaten other country. and now,some people who have an axe to grind magnify the treathen of China,Infact they don't want to see a powerful China to preclude them do vice things.but if you are a bright man,you will see that a powerful china will only good for world peace! |
|
|
March 26th, 2005
| Post 62 |
| No Chance Outside | Never threaten other country? I think this point has been disproven enough for one life time.
__________________ I don't exist.  TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED  Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2005
| Post 63 |
| Milforum Moderator  | Here is some interesting words coming from France No Big Arms Sales to China if Embargo Lifted-Chirac By Elaine Lies TOKYO (Reuters) - French President Jacques Chirac sought to reassure Japan Sunday that lifting Europe's embargo on arms exports to China would not result in an increase in weapons sales, saying the move was aimed at normalizing ties. France has led efforts to secure an early end to the European Union embargo, imposed after China's bloody 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy protests, despite pressure from Washington to keep it in place out of fear China may get access to advanced weapons. Japan has also expressed concern, saying that lifting the embargo could destabilize the Asian region... READ MORE
__________________ "The best form of taking care of troops is first-class training, for this saves unnecessary casualties." Erwin Rommel |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2005
| Post 64 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
well thats good news. | |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2005
| Post 65 |
| Primus Pilus | feixiang is right, china is not agressive for what reason and what sacrifice are we willing to take to inavde foreign countries??? there will be alot more sacrifice than gains taiwan is out of this question because it is a part of china and not a foreign country other than taiwan the chinese government is not going to jeopardize its economy and people for some stupid islands or piece of uselessland ifyou want to object just compare china to other countries, then ull see why china is the least agressive among south korea: vietnam: invasion of cambodia and other indochina countries japan: a whole load of invasions from the 1800 to now, in the future maybe unitedstates: no need to say it, it just invades alot and what did china do... nothing but to protect her territories, that is what the army development is for, i mean cmon, a big country like china needs at least a better army than jap or korea
__________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too. |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2005
| Post 66 |
| No Chance Outside | I really hope Chirac means it. |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2005
| Post 67 |
| Primus Pilus | lol if u can read chinese you wouldnt be posting this the slogan on the truck reads : criminal gang the slogan on the person about to be executed reads: murderer of people ( purposely) (name) these are obviously high0profile criminals who deserve to be excuted for crimes concerning the murder of others btw this is quite an old pic, which with induced thinking leads to alot more infomation.. during the 80s this is the way criminals were killed, and since prositution, pimping, and other society-ill offences were added to excutions, there were alot more killing to be done where does it say tibet people??? besides, these are policemen, not military men, since you guys get them mixed up because oldschool chinese police uniforms are field green like the ones found in pla |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2005
| Post 68 |
| Centurion | lmao, look at this guy defending their actions, holy sh#t i really can't believe this Criminals ? or maybe ppl who wanted a free Tibet ?? I don't think anyone would kill even a rabies infested dog like that
__________________ You can either agree with me or be wrong! |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2005
| Post 69 |
| Primus Pilus | lol, i see your point, but i sorta know how you feel since u dont know all the facts look, if you could prove they are a minority of china, then maybe, maybe you'll have a chance in changing my views of this pics anyways that was wayy off topic |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2005
| Post 70 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
what do you mean to say exactly ? , if they are not the minority then it was appropriate to kill them like that ? And how come only because it shocked you it suddenly became way offtopic ? you were talking about how peaceful a country China was in the earlier post, so i thought i should just make you remember the past  | |
|
|
