Restoration of Chinese Biggest Battleships"Dingyuan"&"Zhenyuan"

About Restoration of Chinese Biggest Battleships"Dingyuan"&"Zhenyuan"


  International Military Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Forums > General Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Discussions
User Name
Password

 
December 10th, 2005   #1
sandy
 

Restoration of Chinese Biggest Battleships"Dingyuan"&"Zhenyuan" info


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingyuan
Now in chine restructured Dingyuan
very interesting.


Gate of Dingyuan,s IRON

The near future,chine will restructure Zhenyuan
as patriot Battleship.



AMMO of Dingyuan

http://www.beiyang.org/dingyuan/bd.htm
reconstruction of dingyuan

Last edited by sandy; December 12th, 2005 at 06:26..
 
December 14th, 2005   #2
bulldogg
 
 
That's supposed to be a battleship? Right on, ok, now I know why I have never heard any stories about the victories of the Chinese Navy.


"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
December 14th, 2005   #3
phoenix80
 
 
looks like a supply/refueling ship! or more of a cruise ship! lol
 
December 14th, 2005   #4
AussieNick
 
 
But by god, look at the shells it carries. Not bad for a cruise ship.
But then again, this was 1881 I believe. We're not talking about a Dreadnought or anything like that.


NEWSFLASH

Royal Australian Navy re-furbishes the HMAS Tinnie.
 
December 14th, 2005   #5
bulldogg
 
 
Tee hee hee
 
December 14th, 2005   #6
Whispering Death
 
 
"Records show that the Dingyuan was recognized as the most advanced battleship of its time, better than any ship in the fleets of Great Britain and Germany."

and it's a cool looking ship. But I don't understand what particular significance this ship has that it was re-made. I mean, I read that wikipedia source and they said it was hurt so bad it had to be scuttled.

Normally we praise ships like the Nimitz carrier that have proven invaluable in wartime and never sunk or the Battleship Texas which was in service for nearly 60 years and, again, never sunk. Praising a ship that was in, what, one battle and got sunk seems odd to me.
 
December 14th, 2005   #7
Missileer
 
 
Allright Tinnie. Lock and load a full broadside of Foster's. Ready, aim, guzzle.





“War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.”
—John Stuart Mill
 
December 14th, 2005   #8
AussieNick
 
 
Fosters will be ineffective sir, we need something of sterner stuff. May I suggest a volley of Carlton Draught, followed by a full broadside of Bundaberg Rum. That'll teach em.
 
December 15th, 2005   #9
bulldogg
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
"Records show that the Dingyuan was recognized as the most advanced battleship of its time, better than any ship in the fleets of Great Britain and Germany."

and it's a cool looking ship. But I don't understand what particular significance this ship has that it was re-made. I mean, I read that wikipedia source and they said it was hurt so bad it had to be scuttled.

Normally we praise ships like the Nimitz carrier that have proven invaluable in wartime and never sunk or the Battleship Texas which was in service for nearly 60 years and, again, never sunk. Praising a ship that was in, what, one battle and got sunk seems odd to me.
Because any moron with a computer can upload stuff onto Wikipedia mate.
 
December 15th, 2005   #10
tomtom22
 
 
Looks like the old Nantucket Lightship


"It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations