| |
November 21st, 2006
| Post 11 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | correct....
__________________ |
|
|
November 21st, 2006
| Post 12 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | How many tons of sand and gravel were dredged from the Potomac for construction?
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2006
| Post 13 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | 680,000 |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2006
| Post 14 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Correct again. |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2006
| Post 15 |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter  | If an imaginary string was stretched around the circumference of the Pentagon, then, it was lifted exactly one inch all the way around, what would be the circumference of the one inch adjusted string?  Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2006
| Post 16 |
| Chief Engineer | The same as it was when it was one inch below.
__________________ "It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations  |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2006
| Post 17 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | 4,605 feet would be the circumference of the Pentagon. However, the circumference of the string is impossible to determine from the information provided. |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2006
| Post 18 |
| Godfather | Isn't it perimeter instead of circumference? |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2006
| Post 19 | |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter | Quote:
| |
|
|
|
November 23rd, 2006
| Post 20 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | So did someone get the answer right yet or not?? |
|
|
