Topic: Which part of the USA Nuclear Triad was More Effective? 2

Damien435 · December 3rd, 2004

Why no love for our nuke cannons? I remember hearing about this, we had like one giant artillery gun in Turkey that we kept movign around and it supposedly caused a lot of headaches for the Soviets because it could set up in a matter of hours and hit many cities or punch a hole in the Russian lines. I think it was called Davy Crocket or Daniel Boone, something like that, or those could have been the "mortar" nukes they are talking about.

View Poll Results :What was the most effective part of the Nuclear Triad that protected the United States during the Fo
Strategic Bomber Force	0	0%
Land Based Missiles	0	0%
Sea Launched Missiles	8	72.73%
They werent needed: Our regular forces ensured the peace.	0	0%
All were needed: All were equal in effectiveness	3	27.27%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

December 3rd, 2004	Post 11
Damien435 Tribunus Laticlavius Gear	Why no love for our nuke cannons? I remember hearing about this, we had like one giant artillery gun in Turkey that we kept movign around and it supposedly caused a lot of headaches for the Soviets because it could set up in a matter of hours and hit many cities or punch a hole in the Russian lines. I think it was called Davy Crocket or Daniel Boone, something like that, or those could have been the "mortar" nukes they are talking about. __________________ Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere. My City