Topic: Which one is better? | |
   |
|
| View Poll Results :Which is better in all aspects of the game? | |||
| The F-16 Fighting Falcon |    | 7 | 43.75% |
| The Sukoi Su 37 Vecter thrust Flanker |    | 9 | 56.25% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| |
| |
Topic: Which one is better? | |
| |
|
| View Poll Results :Which is better in all aspects of the game? | |||
| The F-16 Fighting Falcon | | 7 | 43.75% |
| The Sukoi Su 37 Vecter thrust Flanker | | 9 | 56.25% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
| |
July 9th, 2004
| Post 1 |
| Milites Gregarius | Post; Which one is better?This is a contest of aircraft. Mind you that you should read the specs on the su 37 because you will be supprised at the results. |
|
|
July 9th, 2004
| Post 2 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Warning...this is a little off topic (hell its a lot off topic) SniperWannabee..please do not take this the wrong way... you can put a super sonic wonder wing one up against a simple piper cub...and the piper cub might be the winner if it has the Man (or Woman) that has any sense at all at how to use his craft to his best advantage. The machines technology only gives the person the options that would enhance his ability to win. It doesnt do sqaut to give the Man the incentive, heart and will to win. It goes with anything thats technology..weilded in the hands of a craftsman, anything can be an advantage in a fight. Put an idiot at its controls...well  back to the topic....
__________________ “If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2004
| Post 3 |
| Immunes | I think the F 16 fighting Falcon is better because at supersonic speed planes are less stable
__________________ And when he gets to heaven, To Saint Peter he will tell: One more soldier reporting, sir-- I\'ve served my time in h**l. -Marine Grave inscription on Guadalcanal, 1942 |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 4 |
| Milforum Moderator   | I dont see em as comparable. The SU 37 is a bigger stronger plane, the F16 is smaller and agile.
__________________ In the roar of engines, in the tunder of cannons,in the comradship of blood! |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 5 |
| Centurion | Wait, were comparing a SU37 too a F16.  Thats not even competition. Compare it too a F22 at least, something closer in technology. 
__________________ Just like a sleeping giant, lying in the Sun! In one big hand the Rio Grande, the other Galveston! This is Texas, The Lone Star State of Texas! This is a GIANT, land we love! |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 6 |
| Centurion | Su 37 looks impressive. But it's too big an aircraft in a dogfight with the F-16. Secondly, it is always the skills of the pilot that count in aerial warfare... just like the Iraqis who had some good aricraft too in Desert Storm (1990) but were shot down easily by Allied air force. 
__________________ WHY IN THE WORLD DO WE NEED TO FIGHT SO OFTEN? HAVE WE FORGOTTEN THE BABIES? |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 7 |
| Immunes | Agree with saint. But I LOVE the SU-37  |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 8 |
| Primus Pilus | The Su-37 in the hands of an experienced well trained pilot would be a threat to probably any plane in the world, but the F-16 and Su-37 are completly different so i dont think you can really compare them! |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2004
| Post 9 |
| Milites Gregarius | Post; Apples and OrangesThje bottom line is you cannot have an aerial dogfight at supersonic speeds. It just gets you to the enemy faster. |
|
|
|
August 3rd, 2004
| Post 10 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Technologically, the Su 37 is far more advanced. But it will still lose to an F 16 and a pilot with some brass in the pants(and a well aimed AAMRAM). |
|
|
