Yeah bro chill out. If you want to have a war save up the money for it.
Dont throw the world into any more of a financial tailspin with your warriness

Originally Posted by George

That was sarcasm, just the opposit. Anyone would be better than the Marxist hollow suit & his bunch that are in there now.

*Banging head on brick wall.*

You don't catch on to jokes too easily do you?

The first part of my comment, 'hahaha' and 'agree with you there' were in response to your *known* sarcasm.

The second part about anyone being better than Romney-The-Douche however was not....

Still think Obama's Socialist-Marxist agenda is/should be the central point of urgency in getting him out of there. It also explains his inability in almost 4 years to get the economy going, it just doesn't work with his beliefs.

Originally Posted by George

Still think Obama's Socialist-Marxist agenda is/should be the central point of urgency in getting him out of there. It also explains his inability in almost 4 years to get the economy going, it just doesn't work with his beliefs.

So it's not okay to have a socialist/Marxist in the White House but it is okay to have a man that would take away a woman's right to abort her rapists child? (btw, just so you know, in 30 states if a woman chooses to have her rapists child the rapist has legal right to visitation and in some cases custody...). It's okay to have a man who hides his money in off-shore accounts so he doesn't have to pay taxes? It's okay to have a man like that in the White House?

Tell me, on the ladder of importance don't you think a person's soul, the right to protect the very essence of our human-selves weighs more than "agenda's" of (so-called) "socialism?"

Originally Posted by pixiedustboo

Tell me, on the ladder of importance don't you think a person's soul, the right to protect the very essence of our human-selves weighs more than "agenda's" of (so-called) "socialism?"

See now you are getting into philosophy, does a mans character outweigh his ideology.

In an ideal world it should but sadly character has been driven long ago from politics.

It always intrigues me that when talking politics with Americans they always invariably start talking about the "founding fathers" and how great they were and I have to wonder how the current batch of politicians would stack up in their place.

Personally I think they would have all been tarred, feathered and run out of town on rails within a year.

Originally Posted by pixiedustboo

So it's not okay to have a socialist/Marxist in the White House but it is okay to have a man that would take away a woman's right to abort her rapists child? (btw, just so you know, in 30 states if a woman chooses to have her rapists child the rapist has legal right to visitation and in some cases custody...). It's okay to have a man who hides his money in off-shore accounts so he doesn't have to pay taxes? It's okay to have a man like that in the White House?

Tell me, on the ladder of importance don't you think a person's soul, the right to protect the very essence of our human-selves weighs more than "agenda's" of (so-called) "socialism?"

Romney isn't in favor of the anti-abortion plank, at least as written. Visitation sounds like something a Liberal Judge would think up. If Romney was doing anything illegal in the tax dept, the IRS would be all over him. Pass The Fair Tax & we wouldn't be worried about it. Ask the Russians & Chinese how their souls were doing.
I think the current politicians wouldn't fair well in the early days of the Republic, @ least not in the FF's eyes.

Originally Posted by George

Still think Obama's Socialist-Marxist agenda is/should be the central point of urgency in getting him out of there. It also explains his inability in almost 4 years to get the economy going, it just doesn't work with his beliefs.

It's thought processes like these that ignore the finacial rape and abuse of our goverment of both parties by interest groups and organizations and allow what's really threatening our way life to continue.

The fight of socialism vs. captialism is a early 20th century struggle.

You need to modernize your search for the foundations of our ailing economic structure and how it affect us all. Not symtoms to a conflict over a century old.

Banking, and backdoor finacial polices employed by the FED are far more accurate descriptions to finacial mayhem than "Those darn Commies".

Being Democrat or Repulican anymore is irrelevent. The current administration is on the road to being replaced by an equally miused one.

Our nation's founders did not create offices of government to be faces of tools to create bubbles in industry and open the bazaar on lender freindly loaning practices.

Just blaming those who are in place soley to be blamed is insuring the so cleverly maintained ostrich effect.

When you blame the face of this issue (those in office) and not the root cause (abuse of educational institutions for profit, or unfair lending practices for instance). Then all you are doing is helping those who run the finacial groups who manage this syndicate.

As long as blame (our darn social anit christ president). Then they are free to do what the've always been doing, without challenge. Because people go after the wrong parties and show no interest in actually remedying their failing monetary practices.

I guess you can say nobody likes a cold pale of water to the face? Do they?.

Have fun blaming your scapegoats.

Originally Posted by George

Romney isn't in favor of the anti-abortion plank, at least as written. Visitation sounds like something a Liberal Judge would think up. If Romney was doing anything illegal in the tax dept, the IRS would be all over him. Pass The Fair Tax & we wouldn't be worried about it. Ask the Russians & Chinese how their souls were doing.
I think the current politicians wouldn't fair well in the early days of the Republic, @ least not in the FF's eyes.

In his voting he is. I could give a hoot his words or his written beliefs, his beliefs are those he backs as a man in power.

You are very naive to think as you do on the tax issue. (I am speaking very much about what is 'right,' not what is 'legal.')

Originally Posted by Yossarian

Being Democrat or Repulican anymore is irrelevent. The current administration is on the road to being replaced by an equally misused one.

There it is.

The entire discussion of politics has come to an end - this is TRUTH.

It is sad the reality America is in.

Originally Posted by pixiedustboo

So it's not okay to have a socialist/Marxist in the White House but it is okay to have a man that would take away a woman's right to abort her rapists child?

For anyone who says yes to this, I would like to see you take your own time and committment and be made to care for at least one crack baby. If life is so overwhelmingly precious at conception, then you shouldn't be allowed to turn about and care less once the child is born. You should be made to show dedication to your beliefs after the child is born, not just when it's a fetus.

It's easy to scream what is wrong with you !? in the qouted situation above.But yet not want to put the sole effort of lifting a single finger once reality settles in. And watch the child grow up and complain about prison populations and living in a welfare state.