| |
| | Post 1 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Post; New Supreme Court Justice Samuel AlitoWell as you all know by now Samuel Alito has been nominated to the Supreme Court. Although he is amplefully qualified, his reputation as a hard-core right-wing extremist is bound to touch off a political firestorm. This was another terriable choice for high office because it will totally unbalance the supreme court from a right leaning court to a hardcore extremist one. For the record is as follows Extreme Right Conservatives Scalia Thomas Alito Conservatives Roberts Stevens Moderate Kennedy Souter Liberals Ginsburg Breyer This is bad decision for mulitple reasons 1. Bush showed a total lack of spine as he let the extreme right Bulldoze his nominee and arm twisted him into accepting 'their' choice. Its now appearent that the religous right runs the White House, not the President of the United States. A total lack of leadership, Bush cannot even run his own base. 2. Bush did the one thing the Democrats asked him not to do (name an extremist). In fact Harry Reid asked him specifically NOT to name Alito. The Dems are almost certain to Filibuster this candidate, touching off a political firestorm. This was probably done on purpose as a smokescreen for Bush's other troubles. |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Let's see how we misinterpret this one mmarsh....
__________________ A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Primus Pilus | What's so extreme about him? I'm not being cute, either- I don't know.
__________________ \"The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.\" |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Milforum Hitman | Just a profile of the guy: ![]() Samuel Alito Jr Age: 55 Education: Princeton University, B.A, 1972 Yale Law School, J.D., 1975 Federal Judicial Service: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Nominated by George H.W. Bush on February 20, 1990. Confirmed by the Senate on April 27, 1990, and received commission on April 30, 1990. Professional Career: U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, 1987-1990 Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985-1987 Assistant to the U.S. Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981-1985 Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977-1981 Law Clerk, Hon. Leonard I. Garth, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 1976-1977[/img]
__________________ "Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it". Pericles. ![]() |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | Boy, what a poor choice. Ivy league middle of the road, intelligent, no skeletons in the closet, successful Judge with no red marks. What in the world is Bush thinking of? Did he run out of Ruth "Buzzy" Ginsburgs? I don't really understand why the man accepted a position this much lower than his qualifications.
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I don't understand Bush. He keeps picking candidates that are the "best qualified" after he nominates someone else is the best qualified. Why couldn't he have just researched more and picked one good one.
__________________ /rant |
| |
| | Post 7 | |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I gotcha. Wait and Watch I shall lol. |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | This isn't about intelligence and that isn't what some of us judge him on. We just don't share the same political view on most topics. Since justice and government shouldn't influence one another we have a hard time seeing Bush fill the Supreme Court with "Hawks". Then you can say:"well the Democrates do the same!" and that is true... I'm just against any system that appoints judges: a) for a life time membership. We had that system during the middle ages and people do tend to be touched by age. b) I think politics should stay out of this appointing business. The fact that he is a neo-con is just my personal touch. Since I can't alter the system I rather see a democrat in there instead of a republican. But as I said, that's just my opinion. |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Milforum Hitman | If Alito is a neocon, I'm happy because I agree with the view. Anyways yeah, our judges are very poltical. Many of them also ran for office and were elected. Don't ask me under whose flag. |
| |