| |
| | Post 1 |
| Primus Pilus | Post; Are new russian weapons up to nato standards?I was just wondering this as the new members of the EU and NATO have to upgrade a lot of there equipment or replace it. Some countries such as the Czech Republic are upgrading there equipment and are buying in new stuff like the JAS39 Gripens. They seem to be under pressure from western governments to buy modern western equipment, but could they still buy russian weapon systems, such as BTR-80/90 and BMP-3 and still comply with NATO standards. Thanks |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Milites Gregarius | Ya most definetly, thats just my opinion. I think most new russian equipment is well of in an western army, hey, like germany with the MiG-29, or am i wrong?
__________________ I didnt stumble 1,000 times, the lightbulb had 1,001 steps. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Primus Pilus | Well germanys given the Migs to Poland but I think S.Korea and some arab countries have russian technology, im wondering if they did it for price, or because its better then rival products? |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Optio | From what I know (although I might be wrong), being "Nato-compatible" is more about making radar systems and whatnot compatible and not about making the actual equipment similar. Although Nato-countries might get an extra-discount by manufacturers in Nato-countries. Our country isn't in NATO and we have lots of Russian equipment. The good thing about Russian equipment is the durability which means you can basically bury them in sand and when you get them out they still work. The Russians owed several billions to us in the 1990's and they paid us back in weapons systems like the BUK M1 air defense system. http://www.defense-update.com/products/b/buk.htm And the fall of DDR made large amounts of extremely cheap equipment like the BTR's & BMP's available. |
| |
| | Post 5 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Optio | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Primus Pilus | Is it now in the case of finland, czech republic, poland etc. that the russian technology is all going to be replaced by german,french, british, swedish etc. equipment or is russia equipment going to be used because it has served them well in the past and will in the future? |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Optio | Quote:
Even if Finland were to join Nato in the future, I'd doubt it if we'd ever for example change from 7.62mm to 5.56Nato. It's simply not as usable as 7.62 here in our environment. And western european weapons systems don't exactly fare well in our environment. For example the Crotale NG has some pretty serious reliability issues in the arctic areas. | |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Centurion | Missiles=Amazing Aircraft=Pretty good Ships=TEH suck Tanks=not great Other vehicles=good infantry=decent
__________________ Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute -Samuel L. |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Optio | I think that modern Russian equipment is very much up to NATO standard. In some ways I think it's even better. A Russian fighter jet doesn't need the runway brushed of for every liitle object. A Russian Navy ship can run on almost every kind of oil. Russian euqipment is'nt usually that sophisticated but they do work well in combat. I've said it before never underestimate the Russians. |
| |