Topic: Multi-barreled tank? 4

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology > Armored Military Vehicles Discussions
User Name
Password

 
January 3rd, 2006   Post 31
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Just imagine if the Germans have the Materials to make those tanks! I don't even think D-Day was possible ! Those tanks whould have shoot down afew ships!
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 32
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
That picture is the Ratte. BTW, it was bigger than the Mause by a bit. That thing weighs/would have weighed over 1000 tons. I'm not 100% sure whether the Ratte or the Mause ever had a working prototype, but that's definitely the general design. Crazy idea IMHO. The reason it has 2 Main Gun barrels is because its a Battleship's gun turret they were going to use.
That is incorrect. That tank is neither the Ratte nor the Mause.

The tank in that picture is entirely fictional to the best of my knowledge.

As crazy as the Ratte is, the thing in that picture is rediculous beyond even Nazi imaginations.

The Ratte as designed had 8 flak guns on it.
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 33
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

o! Any one has pics of Ratte?
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 34
Damien435
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear



__________________
Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere.

My City
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 35
godofthunder9010
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

The trouble with making the Mause or Ratte is pretty simple and it goes back to exactly the same lesson learned in WW2 in the Pacific: Big targets like Battleships make very easy targets for combat aircraft.
__________________
"It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it."
- General Robert E. Lee
Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!!

"It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 36
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

yes, but on the other side, it causes great damage to the land forces!
 
January 5th, 2006   Post 37
godofthunder9010
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

It also would collapse any bridge in the world. 1000 tons!! Know any bridge that could handle that? Several of that? If there is a sinkhole anywhere, the Ratte or Mause would have found them and fallen into them.

Consider the current concept adopted by the Navies of the world. The old monster Battleships are all being decomissioned b/c you can pack more firepower for less expense and maintenance into lots of smaller ships. They're also harder to hit and if you take out 1, you still have all the rest.
 
January 5th, 2006   Post 38
Mohmar Deathstrike
Banned
 
 
Gear



It's Maus, not Mause.

That last pic of the Ratte looks awesome.

What does it say above the girl? "Kleines" or "Kleiner" "R..."? Kleines/r means "little" or "small".

Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
The trouble with making the Mause or Ratte is pretty simple and it goes back to exactly the same lesson learned in WW2 in the Pacific: Big targets like Battleships make very easy targets for combat aircraft.
Then they should just stick an airstrip with interceptors on top of it .

Last edited by Mohmar Deathstrike; January 5th, 2006 at 20:34.
 
January 6th, 2006   Post 39
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Well, with an airstrip, it becomes a mobile tank aircraft carrer! I think it is a Frau. Howcome it is Kleiner?
__________________

- Ready To Strike -
 
January 6th, 2006   Post 40
Mohmar Deathstrike
Banned
 
 
Gear



If it's Frau, it should be Kleine (with no r or s). The adjective is probably ironic.