| |
March 2nd, 2008
| Post 531 | |
| Optio |  Quote:
 They went further and invented the bigger one MON-200 too, which was even greater waste of resources - it weighted 25 kg and has diameter of 43 cm... With 30m wide and 150m long killing zone it consumed 12 kg of tnt - way too much to kill few soldiers - no possibility, that crowd of enemy will appear in the killing zone... So the most popular Soviet/Russian Claymore is MON-50, almost 1:1 copy of American M-18A1 (MON-50 has a slightly greater overall weight (2 vs. 1,6kg), but less number of ready-to-use shrapnel [~500 vs. 678]). Well, Your turn next!
__________________ Last edited by Supostat : March 2nd, 2008 at 11:50. Reason: 8 and ) is not good together, they make a smiley! | |
|
|
March 2nd, 2008
| Post 532 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | I'd like a MON-200 if the Chinese attack!! 
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED  Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com Last edited by the_13th_redneck : March 2nd, 2008 at 09:47. |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2008
| Post 533 |
| Optio | Calico SMG? |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2008
| Post 534 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | not specific enough. Calico yes, SMG yes.. but it's not the model number. |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2008
| Post 535 |
| Optio | Won't there be any hints?  |
|
|
|
March 24th, 2008
| Post 536 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | Chambered for .22LR or 9mm |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2008
| Post 537 |
| Primus Pilus | Calico M950?
__________________ Midshipman 3/C, USNR |
|
|
