| |
| | Post 11 |
| Banned ![]() | depends how you view it! and I dont mind to look back and see how people see the history! It is okay though. I am not sentimental or too emotional regarding these things But I'd like to know why you think like that! Iranian troops had occupied Al-Faw peninsula and cut the Basra-Faw highway for 2 years and were forced to fall back only due to the vast Chemical weapons used by the Iraqis. It is not a victory or bravery when one side uses extensive Chemicals to reach the objective. It is cowardice in my book no matter where I am from. Right after the UN resolution 697 which resulted in the peace treaty between the 2 countries , not even a Sq inch of the Iranian soil/territory was occupied by the Iraqis. The Iraqi Navy was wiped out a few weeks after the start of the war in Sep 1980 and they had to export Oil through Turkey or Saudi Arabia They had been getting new and modern military stuff from Europeans and Russians while we were completely left alone and fighting to survive on our own! (actually being fair, Israelis helped us too) but Saudis giving the Iraqis info and intel through their AWACS, US turning a blind eye on the Iraqis violating the Persian Gulf international air space (they used it to reach Iran), French gave them super etendard jets and Mirages, ..... etc But like I said, I really don't mind about this thing any more. There is a new government in place in Iraq which has no ill intentions against my country any more and the rest is history for now! But as a person who spent his childhood in many Iranian air bases and under Iraqi air and missile raids, I can tell you that I have experienced the things I am talking about and other than that there is nothing else I'd want to brag about. Last edited by phoenix80; December 31st, 2005 at 04:05. |
| |
| | Post 12 | ||||
| Milforum's Bouncer | Quote:
Here's mine. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck | ||||
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Banned ![]() | you can believe in whatever you wish! The fact is not gonna change if you are fed with the biased stories btw, although iiaf.net is good in pictures and history, it is poor and out dated in terms of analysis and the guy (Maj. Nasirkhani whom I know personally) who wrote (read CUT AND PASTED) the stories on F-14A/F-4/F-5 has not lived in Iran since 1978 so the info he is providing can not be accurate. He copied and pasted those articles from another biased source. I do not know why and many many have written him to update and correct the info on their web site! www.acig.org is the only credible source on Iranian AF readiness for now. And I have provided xilion of links to back up my arguement and recommended 3 books to read, but seems they fell on deaf ears! BTW, I wonder why you insist on saying that our F-14As are not functioning well? Last edited by phoenix80; December 31st, 2005 at 06:12. |
| |
| | Post 14 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Funny you claim my stories are biased when it is NOT my words. You made specific claims and I countered them. You called me arrogant and misinformed yet you have no sources to back up your specific claims. The first source on here is an Iranian Major, bonafide honest to God Iranian Air Force officer. Do tell how am I being misinformed? He is in fact an Iranian Air Force pilot. I have sent him an invite to join our forum via his email. I hope he accepts and I look forward to your interactions with the honourable Major. |
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Banned ![]() | lol ok! dream on! if he had time, he could edit those stupid pages! He has a business to run in Mission Viejo, California now rather than coming here and start debating you! LMAO www.acig.org is the only credible source on Iranian AF readiness for now. And I have provided xilion of links to back up my arguement and recommended 3 books to read, but seems you'd rather stay ill-informed or may be you are too arrogant to accept the truth!? why don't you join www.acig.org/forum to read a bitand learn more? that so-called major copied info from this page and pasted into his web page http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f14_6.html wordings, sentences... etc are all the same thing. He didnt write those stuff since he hasnt lived in IRAN since 1978. He has no credible info and insight into the readiness of the Iranian AF. I served in that god damn AF. My father is a retired Colonel of the same force and I know it very well. It is like that I keep telling you about the life in China! Hell you know more than I do about that! How can you back your argument up with bunch of biased links and sources? Those sites have no intentions in accepting the truth. You wanna know more, then read acig.org Now you can stay misinformed or uninformed while the reality is something else! Last edited by phoenix80; December 31st, 2005 at 06:23. |
| |
| | Post 16 | |||||||||
| Milforum's Bouncer | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||||
| |
| | Post 17 |
| Banned ![]() | so whats your point?! most of those people praise the pics! LoL.. Didn't you find my signature among them cuz I thanked them as well? that web site was last updated a year ago. I am again providing the very same links....... http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/cat_index_15.shtml http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_214.shtml http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_206.shtml http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_205.shtml http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_219.shtml ![]() http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_452.shtml http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_445.shtml ![]() Review by Peter B. Mersky, USNR (Ret.), in US Combat Naval Aviation News: PROFESSIONAL READING: Review of Iranian F-14 Tomcats in Combat Naval Aviation News (Washington) Sep/Oct 2005.Vol.87, Iss. 6; pg. 24 Iranian F-14 Tomcat Units In Combat (Osprey Combat Aircraft) (Paperback) by Tom Cooper, Farzad Bishop PROFESSIONAL READING: Review of Iranian F-14 Tomcats in Combat Naval Aviation News (Washington) Sep/Oct 2005.Vol.87, Iss. 6; pg. 24 Iranian F-14 Tomcat Units In Combat (Osprey Combat Aircraft) (Paperback) by Tom Cooper, Farzad Bishop Publisher: Osprey Publishing (UK) (October 15, 2004) Language: English ISBN: 1841767875 Undoubtedly one of the more unusual titles in Osprey's highly successful Combat Aircraft series, No. 49 presents a familiar U.S. Navy fighter in an unexpected venue, flying with the green-white-red roundels of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) and desert camouflage. Before he was overthrown in 1979, the Shah of Iran bought 80 F-14A Tomcats, 79 of which were delivered, together with their AIM-54 Phoenix missiles. The bloody revolution saw many of the "Shah's pilots" thrown into prison. When the long and equally bloody conflict with Iraq began in September 1980, the religious leaders of Iran saw the merit of restoring these highly skilled aviators to the cockpits of these expensive planes. Despite long months of incarceration, most of the returning Tomcat crews of the newly formed IRIAF quickly demonstrated their collective skill and patriotism, eventually taking their F-14s through eight years of intense aerial combat. Although hard-pressed to maintain their fleet of American-built fighters, Iranian ground crews kept as many as 60 Tomcats mission capable throughout much of the war, despite a lack of parts, normal attrition, and dwindling supplies of material and munitions. Iranian F-14 crews clashed repeatedly with Iraqi MiGs and French Mirage F-Is as the Iraqis attacked Iranian oil platforms and storage facilities. The fact that many of these highly skilled, aggressive Iranian crews had been in prison after the revolution makes their story all the more remarkable. These crews are responsible for the only kills scored by the highly touted Phoenix missile, which, along with the AWG-9 nose-mounted radar, was at the heart of the F14's weapons system. Throughout the book, the Tomcat's capabilities are highlighted in a way not seen in accounts of U.S. Navy operations and are nearly too much to be believed. Iraqi MiG-21 and MiG-23 pilots didn't stand a chance against the big American swing-wing fighter. The equally large and powerful MiG-25-some flown by Soviet instructor pilots-had to rely on its eye-watering speed to disengage from a flight of IRIAF Tomcats. IRIAF Tomcats scored the F-14's first kills a full year before the U.S. Navy's Fighter Squadron 41 Libyan MiG killers, and if the book is to be believed, went on to gain more than 150 victories against the Iraqis. According to the list of individual kills in the book's appendices, there appear to be two or three IRIAF F-14 aces, one of whom scored at least nine confirmed kills. This book's photos and text abound with surprising details and accounts little known in the Western press, which the authors say was sadly misinformed as to the status and operational readiness of the IRIAF's Tomcat fleet. One unfortunately confusing aspect of the text is the authors' assertion that the names of the pilots whose experiences are featured in the text are not their true identities. Thus, as we read about a particular pilot's success or consult the appendices for details on Tomcat kills, we wonder who the Iranian aviator really was. However, I have since learned that the names given in the list of kills are the actual names. A little confusing, but at least we have some idea of these successful crews' identities. This work is an entertaining look at an air force and arena that have seldom seen any in-depth exposure. [Author Affiliation] By Cdr. Peter B. Mersky, USNR (Ret.) Last edited by phoenix80; December 31st, 2005 at 06:41. |
| |
| | Post 18 | |
| Milforum's Bouncer | The points are as follows. 1. You have no source to back up claims made here that counter the numbers of planes that were operational during the 1980's post revolution embargo. 2. You claim a site is bogus and not accurate while numerous bonafide Iranian veterans publicly sign their name and comment to the contrary. As for the rest I will wait for the Major to comment on your stories and claims. I am not an expert on Iran, never did claim this. I do however claim a very good working knowledge of english and a couple other languages and the ability to read and reason. I look forward to reading the words of a real Iranian veteran on this forum soon. Till then I will let this ride. From your own sources: Quote:
Edited for the reading impaired. Last edited by bulldogg; December 31st, 2005 at 07:52. | |
| |
| | Post 19 | |
| Optio | Quote:
1- Iraq was driven back to its border after 2 years of fighting in Iranian territory. 2- Iraq was forced to defend its borders for 6 years. And even used Chemical Weapons against invading Iranian Troops / Militants. But it is true that Iraq emerged stronger then before after this war in terms of military power (becoming the 4th largest Military power in the world). So you can say that this war failed to put a dent on Saddam's ambitions. | |
| |
| | Post 20 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
I m unsure if you can see tons of links I have given you so far! I am really amazed Btw, did you serve in our Air Force? I have served in a unit which was responsible to count the combat ready aircrafts of the Iranian AF every single morning and report it to the HQ. Sorry can't tell you more than this! Want to know more, go read the links I provided or read the books. I find your comments not worthy of responses any more! Sorry but this discussion is over! http://misc.kitreview.com/bookreviews/iranianf14bookreviewkb_1.htm http://www.internetmodeler.com/2004/november/new-releases/book_osprey-f14.php The history of Iranian F-14s was long thought to have been a short one, with the United States officially stating that lack of spares and training effectively grounded the fleet. This book proves otherwise, and in fact shows that not only was the F-14 not grounded, but it actually performed as advertised, racking up an impressive tally of 159 kills during the Iran-Iraq war. Last edited by phoenix80; December 31st, 2005 at 06:52. | |
| |