| |
| | Post 1 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | Post; MeK, PMOI, NCRI... blah, blah, blahThe MeK is a dangerous CULT. In some cases worse than the regime they are fighting. I would like to start a new thread on just this topic alone.
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Milforum Hitman | Here http://www.danielpipes.org/article/1100 it says a whole totally different thing. I'm not arguing, I'm just asking.
__________________ "Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it". Pericles. ![]() |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Milforum Hitman | Oh are they? Mmm |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | They are also common thieves that set up dummy charities to fund their exploits. They hold captive their members. They are the Waco, Texas of the middle east. |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Banned ![]() | Thanks a milion for this topic They are dangerous and hated by the Iranian people! Informative articles on MEK/MKO/NCRI are as follows: MEK in US Navy web site http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/mek.htm --------------- Hired Hecklers (MEK) FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | September 19, 2005 | By Kenneth R. Timmerman http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=19533 --------------- With Friends Like These (MEK, Iran & USA) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1495002/posts --------------- Iranian Exiled Armed Group (MEK) Abuses Dissident Members HRW ^ | May 19th, 05 http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2005.../iran10967.htm |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Banned ![]() | They killed many American servicemen during the 1970s in Iran They sided with Saddam in 1980s to fight their own people They killed too many innocent people in the streets of Tehran (mostly IEDs were involved) between 1979-1982 The MEK/NCRI was involved in killing Kurds and Shiites in south and north of Iraq in 1991 |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | Yep, and I hope they stay on the FTO (foreign terrorist organization) list for many, many years to come. Even one of their biggest American supporters is distancing himself from them. Congressional Response Your June 13 edition on the alien invasion of our country was a great treatment of the topic of illegal immigration. The only thing I found that warrants a response other than accolades was your characterization of the Mujahaddin Kalq (MEK) as a "Marxist terrorist group." Although their roots may indeed have been intertwined with those elements, they claim to have long since abandoned their leftist ideology in favor of a commitment to overthrow the regime in Tehran and replace it with a nonsectarian, democratic government. The fact that the mullahs in Tehran despise and fear the MEK helps bolster their status in my mind. My "support" for them is much more a support for what they hope to accomplish. I couldn't care less if, in a democratic process, the people of Iran were to choose a different party to lead the country as long as it was committed to the same goals. REP. TOM TANCREDO 6th Congressional District, Colorado |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Banned ![]() | But I wonder why they are now protected by the US Army?! |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | Because they were given Protected Person's status under the 4th Geneva Convention. At the beginning of the war, they were disarmed and put up at a camp in Iraq. (yes I know the name of the camp). |
| |