| |
October 7th, 2004
| Post 11 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius  | Well, actually, mobility may or may not be important. The question is, 1v1 who wins??
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase |
|
|
October 7th, 2004
| Post 12 |
| No Chance Outside | With a faster Tank, you have the better say in where the fight will take place and under what circumstnaces. Of course or the tanks can just sit there and wait it out lol.
__________________ I don't exist.  TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED  Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2004
| Post 13 |
| Primus Pilus | The Abrams track record is just too good for me to chose anything else. |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2004
| Post 14 |
| Centurion | The Merkava also has an excellent track record. They made jokes out of T-72s just like the Abrams did and have been in counter insurgency operations pretty much every day since. In a 1v1 fight, it's who ever see's each other first. I don't know much about the optics on the Merkava, but the TC has a great view when buttoned up, thanks to cameras placed around the tank. The M1A2's x50 FLIR is the best in the world though.
__________________ Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute -Samuel L. |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2004
| Post 15 |
| Milforum Moderator   | Well, the M1A2 is the winner  .
__________________ Breath dust, eat grease, drink diesel. Sleep standing up and fight sitting down. Think you'r a man? Join the tanks! |
|
|
