MBT 1on1 Final match!!!Leo Vs. Abrams.

About MBT 1on1 Final match!!!Leo Vs. Abrams.


  International Military Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Forums > General Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Discussions
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Which is better?
Leo 2A6 10 45.45%
M1A2 Abrams 12 54.55%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

 
October 7th, 2004   #1
SHERMAN
 
 

MBT 1on1 Final match!!!Leo Vs. Abrams. info


Alright, you know the drill, start voting. The poll will last 2 days this time. Im not specifying sources, cause you already saw the sources many times...


 
October 7th, 2004   #2
Trevor
 
Abrams owns!


WO2 Trevor Perry,
Squadron Deputy Commander
746 Lightning Hawk RCACS
 
October 7th, 2004   #3
AlexKall
 
My vote: Defenetly the Leo 2A6

They are both built of off the same original thank and i think the Leo took the right turn
 
October 7th, 2004   #4
Doppleganger
 
 
Very close match but I like the Leo2 A6 as well. It came from the same basic tank design as the Abhrams but the Leo2 A6 has seen more evolution. With the proposed 1650hp engine it will have better mobility and has the new added mine protection as well. An almost faultless tank design IMO and the best tank in the world today.

IMO it goes:

1. Leo 2 A6
2. Abhrams M2A2
3. Challenger 2
4. Merkava Mk IV
 
October 7th, 2004   #5
A Can of Man
 
 
I'd say the M-1A2 Abrams. The Leo 2 hasn't ever been tested in combat. The Abrams is PROVEN. So the Abrams gets my pick. The fact that they're so similar but one's been battle tested and passed with flying colors.
 
October 8th, 2004   #6
BigBert96
 
Abrams. Battle tested, Congress approved! Its got better mobility right now, I dont care what the Germans are proposing to upgrade, as of right now, the m1 has better mobility, sights, safety features, and experience. I dont even think the Leo has blow out panels does it? Not that its a bad tank, its a hell of a tank, just not up to m1's standards though. It does look pretty though!


\"It puts the lotion on its skin.\"

Joe Dirt
 
October 8th, 2004   #7
Doppleganger
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBert96
Abrams. Battle tested, Congress approved! Its got better mobility right now, I dont care what the Germans are proposing to upgrade, as of right now, the m1 has better mobility, sights, safety features, and experience. I dont even think the Leo has blow out panels does it? Not that its a bad tank, its a h**l of a tank, just not up to m1's standards though. It does look pretty though!
Well has it got better mobility right now? They are probably pretty even on that score right now.

I don't think there's a wrong answer here - they are both top class tanks.
 
October 8th, 2004   #8
Kozzy Mozzy
 
The Leo has blowout panels, but half of it's ammo is stored in the hull, next to the driver. The Leo doesn't have the x50 FLIR of the Abrams and the L55 firing DM53 still doesn't penetrate as much as the M289A3. The M1A2SEP is a *slightly* better tank.


Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute
-Samuel L.
 
October 8th, 2004   #9
A Can of Man
 
 
Next to the driver? Isn't that the most vulnerable spot fron the front side of the tank???
Jeez...
 
October 8th, 2004   #10
rOk
 
 
Leo, from the makers of the best tanks...


I hear you...