| |
| | Post 1 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; 2,600 US Marines to join SOCOMQuote:
__________________ /rant | |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Sounds more like another politically charged Pentagon turf war.
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | i thought they tried this a while back but then dopped it?
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | No they didn't try it before AFAIK, the Marines have fought this concept from day one. They have this "no Marine is more elite than the others, one Corps" culture that they would have rather retain. The Army Special Forces and Navy SEALS have been doing it for years now so I suspect the Marines will make the adjustment too and it'll be fine.
__________________ "I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier." To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post. |
| |
| | Post 5 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 6 | ||
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | [quote="mmarsh"] Quote:
Quote:
OPFOR is a term that means "OPposing FORce". During training some soldiers(usually very experienced) are designated as OPFOR for the purpose of providing some opposition for the unit undergoing the training (I have done this many times)providing them with a more realistic scenario. On second thought, I have seen the term (OPFOR)used in documents to describe the enemy forces. But in general conversation the enemy is more likely to be called the bad guys (among other things) than OPFOR. At least that's my opinion. | ||
| |
| | Post 7 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Quote:
The regular infantry that will conduct the FID mission will only be an available asset to SOCOM, and will not be comprised of SOF Marines. The Marine Corps is losing its best operators for this unit, they will no longer be a Marine only asset. This has caused quite a few feathers to be ruffled from my bosses (fellas that wear a lot of shiney stars) and down. There are many in the Corps that are not happy with this, whether or not we will remain in SOCOM has yet to be seen. As with everything, is has its positives and negatives. | |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | RndrSafe. So the FMTU concept is a go now? As far as FID are they going to be used like the 75th is tasked?
__________________ The only people I like besides my wife and children are MARINES. Col. Oliver North USMC |
| |
| | Post 9 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Quote:
There is a loose similarity in organisation to SF, they are running 11 to 12 man teams with end goal of having 24 teams. All of the support for the moment is coming out of 4thMEB. They won't have as specific AOs as SF groups do...right now the big focus is the Middle East and Latin America. Obviously, they will not be as area oriented, culturally prepared or language qualified to the same degree as SF units are for their target countries, but they will provide good augmentation for already bogged down SF units who are being tasked with more DA than FID missions. While I am not sure this is the best mission for the Corps to be committed to, everyone involved is eager and despite the hurtles there will be, ready to get the job done. | |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Optio | There's more on the FMTU concept here, from a report in early October: http://www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn20...6?OpenDocument or http://tinyurl.com/9o7jm Personally, I am surprised the USMC went with the whole SOCOM deal. I thought it was a guiding doctrine that their critical assets remain under USMC command. Changing times. |
| |