| |
| | Post 41 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | No one mentioning the Leopard 2IS? And dont say its the same as the Leopard 2A6 as its not even made by the german company, although that problem still stands that its not been combat proven. Its a shame, but they dont need those tanks in peacekeeping missions |
| |
| | Post 42 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Heres some specification of the Swedish version: Quote:
Its a bit old though. | |
| |
| | Post 43 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Well..you guys sure do know your tanks... If I had my druthers, id say I like the tanks described in David Drakes "Hammers Slammers" series of Sci-Fi war novels. So let me ask you tankers this: Is it possible that if they had fusion or an unlimited source of power, that a tank could ride on an air cushion and be an all terrain master as described in these novels? I know im off subject, but i am just curious: I always loved to read the stories dealing with the Tank warfare aspects of Sci-Fi. ![]()
__________________ “If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF |
| |
| | Post 44 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Post; lollol@hover tank. Now, All versions of the Leopard are serious hardware!
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 45 |
| Tirones | i would rather choose T-92U, or even better a T-95 the best tank in the world. It has reactive armor that is very well built. If anyone want's to arguee with me go right ahead i'm waiting |
| |
| | Post 46 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | There are weapons capable of penetrating thick reactive armor |
| |
| | Post 47 |
| Banned ![]() | I dont want to seem late or anything but why is it called reactive armor? |
| |
| | Post 48 |
| Buttercup ![]() | Ok I don't have the expertise to go into details here, but reactive armor "reacts" to a projectile hitting the vehicle with greater than 200 pounds of pressure I believe, it redirects the force of the projectile/charge away from the main body/crew compartment of the vehicle via an internal charge.
__________________ No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen. |
| |
| | Post 49 |
| Banned ![]() | ah ok thanks i alwais wondered about that... |
| |
| | Post 50 |
| Buttercup ![]() | No problem. |
| |