Topic: Leopard 2 vs. Abrams 6

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology > Armored Military Vehicles Discussions
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Leopard 2 vs. Abrams
Leopard 2 12 50.00%
Abrams 12 50.00%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
January 17th, 2006   Post 51
CanadianCombat
Centurion
 
 
Gear

I would have voted for the Leo 2 but I fogot about this thread. My bad. so technicalliy the Leo 2 would have won 13 to 12, but I came to late..........DAMN DAMN DAMN.
__________________
If we don't end war,war will end us.
 
January 18th, 2006   Post 52
Kozzy Mozzy
Centurion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
Only one report of penetration for enemy fire is recorded, that is of the strange round the pentrated throught the non-ballistic skirts and into the Hydraulic Reservoir, this is on page 8 of the report.
Yes, and after that report was published another RPG found penetration.
 
December 6th, 2007   Post 53
Pale Rider
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kozzy Mozzy
Yes, and after that report was published another RPG found penetration.
That is simply a false statement, only one penetration that was explained to you by another forum poster, FO Seaman. and that freak round may of well been a reguler RPG-7 projectile that entered through a roadwheel arm housing. No tandem projectiles as of yet have been used in Iraq.
 
December 16th, 2007   Post 54
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Has the Leopard ever been a tank to tank battle.
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
December 16th, 2007   Post 55
Pale Rider
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Has the Leopard ever been a tank to tank battle.
No - not yet anyways, this could change with the additional export sales though.
 
December 21st, 2007   Post 56
AlexKall
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Leopard 1, yes in very small encounters and very few times. Leopard 2, as said, not yet.
__________________


Devin, they are holding your life and they will never let go! Come home safe!
 
December 21st, 2007   Post 57
SHERMAN
Milforum Moderator
 
 
Gear

RPG-7s, at some anges and areas, can penetrate the toughest tanks in the world. Some RPG rounds now have 700mm penetration, and no tank is expected to be protected 360 against that...
__________________
 
December 21st, 2007   Post 58
Pale Rider
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
Leopard 1, yes in very small encounters and very few times. Leopard 2, as said, not yet.
Could you elaborate a little more on the tank to tank engagement that the LEO 1 has been a part of.
 
December 21st, 2007   Post 59
Pale Rider
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHERMAN
RPG-7s, at some anges and areas, can penetrate the toughest tanks in the world. Some RPG rounds now have 700mm penetration, and no tank is expected to be protected 360 against that...
Yes - RPG 7V and RPG - 29 are nasty little buggers with their tandem shaped charges. Alot of people do not realize it but most of the tanks out there offer the best protection at the 60 degree frontal ark, they are not designed to fight in urbanized settings. Best tank fielded for this type of operation would have to go to the Merkava 4 with its modular armor design and ballistic angles.
 
December 22nd, 2007   Post 60
Damien435
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

I would like to say that the above statement is ludicrous and that everybody knows tanks are not designed for urban warfare. Unfortunately I've seen how ignorant my fellow students are in all matters not related to the big party at (insert fraternity name here) and have to concede that very few people realize tanks are actually designed to duel on open plains or better yet, ambush from concealed positions, punch a whole in the enemy lines, and move forward with infantry and air support. Most people seem to think tanks are designed to work on their own or in small groups with other tanks hundreds of miles away from the nearest supply depot/fuel truck.
__________________
Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere.

My City