Leopard 2 vs. Abrams

About Leopard 2 vs. Abrams Page 2


  International Military Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Forums > Armored Military Vehicles Discussions
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Leopard 2 vs. Abrams
Leopard 2 12 50.00%
Abrams 12 50.00%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
January 8th, 2006   #11
AlexKall
 
Guess this fits in here then: http://alexkall.shackspace.com/files/strv122.wmv

I will always go with Leopard 2 (in this round up) until the US forces come up with something new




Devin, they are holding your life and they will never let go! Come home safe!
 
January 9th, 2006   #12
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
Guess this fits in here then: http://alexkall.shackspace.com/files/strv122.wmv

I will always go with Leopard 2 (in this round up) until the US forces come up with something new
You'll be waiting a few years, the M1A2 is planned to be the U.S. Army's FCS until like 2020.




 
January 9th, 2006   #13
seth
 
I vote for Leopard 2.
They both have comparable performances in armor, armament, speed but Leo2 is more economic and have anti-mine protection.
 
January 9th, 2006   #14
AlexKall
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
You'll be waiting a few years, the M1A2 is planned to be the U.S. Army's FCS until like 2020.
Aww Well its a nice tank but i want to see something newer
 
January 10th, 2006   #15
Kozzy Mozzy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
Aww Well its a nice tank but i want to see something newer
the FCS wont be a tank in the conventional sense
 
January 10th, 2006   #16
godofthunder9010
 
 
Out of curiosity, doesn't the M1a2 still use M60's that require you to open the hatch and endanger crew members or have they gone with a coaxial now?


"It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it."
- General Robert E. Lee
Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!!

"It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase
 
January 11th, 2006   #17
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Out of curiosity, doesn't the M1a2 still use M60's that require you to open the hatch and endanger crew members or have they gone with a coaxial now?
Huh?

The M1 in 1980 had a coaxial (M240), the loader uses an M240B and did for a short time use the M60D.

I think what your trying to get at is if the Army has installed a similiar system to CROWS for the loader. The coaxial or coax is the gun next to the main gun.
 
January 11th, 2006   #18
zander_0633
 
 
I will defitnely votet for Leo 2 cause there is news that a single RPG round can destroy a Abrams! In this case, it happened in Iraq!



- Ready To Strike -
 
January 11th, 2006   #19
godofthunder9010
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zander_0633
I will defitnely votet for Leo 2 cause there is news that a single RPG round can destroy a Abrams! In this case, it happened in Iraq!
If its the right kind of RPG, a single round can destroy a Leo to, just to be fair. A single RPG can also knock out a Challenger II which is better protected that either of these.
 
January 11th, 2006   #20
godofthunder9010
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
Huh?

The M1 in 1980 had a coaxial (M240), the loader uses an M240B and did for a short time use the M60D.

I think what your trying to get at is if the Army has installed a similiar system to CROWS for the loader. The coaxial or coax is the gun next to the main gun.
Oops!