![]() | About Leopard 2 vs. Abrams Page 2 |
![]() |
| | #11 |
| | I will always go with Leopard 2 (in this round up) until the US forces come up with something new ![]() Devin, they are holding your life and they will never let go! Come home safe! |
![]() | |
| |
| | #12 | |
| | Quote:
![]() | |
| | #13 |
| |
I vote for Leopard 2. They both have comparable performances in armor, armament, speed but Leo2 is more economic and have anti-mine protection. |
| | #14 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #15 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #16 |
| |
Out of curiosity, doesn't the M1a2 still use M60's that require you to open the hatch and endanger crew members or have they gone with a coaxial now?
"It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase |
| | #17 | |
| | Quote:
The M1 in 1980 had a coaxial (M240), the loader uses an M240B and did for a short time use the M60D. I think what your trying to get at is if the Army has installed a similiar system to CROWS for the loader. The coaxial or coax is the gun next to the main gun. | |
| | #18 |
| |
I will defitnely votet for Leo 2 cause there is news that a single RPG round can destroy a Abrams! In this case, it happened in Iraq!
- Ready To Strike - |
| | #19 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #20 | |
| | Quote:
| |
![]() |