Topic: Korea Nuke test a fake

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
October 10th, 2006   Post 1
Team Infidel
Milforum's Postmaster
 
 
Gear



Post; Korea Nuke test a fake


Ok, here is a theory... nK did not, I repeat, did NOT detonate a nuke this past weekend. That the explosion was used with conventional bombs to simulate the effects of a nuke.

They would do this inorder to see what the world reaction would be. The close in strategy would reveal our hand and by the time that we figure out that it was in fact not a nuke, everyone testing and developing nukes would see what the world reaction would be.

These guys are testing the waters to see world reaction.

Any takers on this theory?
__________________
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 2
ill be damed if i know
Optio
 
 
i heard somewhere that the explosion had the power of one of the nuke bombs dropped on japan at end of ww2 , your theory is possible but they would of had to use a hell of alot of conventional explosives to get that sort of power ,if i heard was correct of course ......
__________________
England expects every man to do his duty:Horatio Nelson 1805 (so i guess that means the scots,irish and welsh can stay at home and have all the booze and girls to themselves,sounds good to me)
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 3
SNowblind
Immunes
 
Gear

Nuclear weapons generally have power equivalent to hundreds, if not thousands, of large conventional shells, I trust that NK can't move several entire convoys of bombs without the U.S./Allies finding out. It problably is for real, though one can only wonder at the NK government's idiocy.
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 4
Donkey
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Only Russia thinks it was on the 5-15 kilo ton (kt) range (Hiroshima was 12.5kt), France is at the lowest with .5kt and the rest are saying around 1kt....

So it is possible that it could have been conventional weapons. However a nuclear detonation gives out a distinct seismic wave that would be easily detected by South Korea, so basically we have to take their word for it.

Now that could spin your theory even more...What if NK was trying to test the waters and SK is all like you know what expletive these guys and in turn encourages the world to do their dirty work...

But we do know that NK has plenty of plutonium to make a neutron bomb (releases more radiation), so it is a tough guess but I dont think SK would BS...
__________________
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 5
Rob Henderson
Milforum Idol
 
 
We are hypothetically speaking, right? In that case, I think its possible that they might have done it to see what we(world) would do, but I also think that North Korea might have set off conventional weapons to warn South Korea. Now, South Korea should have easily detected the difference in explosions, but whos to know wether or not it was conventional bombs or not...Basically, we just have to see what happens...
__________________
C/1Lt Ret. Henderson
"Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think."- Fortune Cookie
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 6
Damien435
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

I always thought that because of the amount of mass needed to form a chain reaction a nuclear explosion could never be smaller than 3kt's.
__________________
Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere.

My City
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 7
MontyB
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
I think its a possibility but I have no doubts about their ability to build and use dirty bombs so I dont really think it would lessen the threat.
__________________
To mistrust science and deny the validity of the scientific method is to resign your job as a human. You'd better go look for work as a plant or wild animal.
P. J. O'Rourke
 
October 10th, 2006   Post 8
Donkey
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien435
I always thought that because of the amount of mass needed to form a chain reaction a nuclear explosion could never be smaller than 3kt's.
I believe you are confusing the neutron multiplication factor with equivalent kilotons of TNT... i.e. when k= 2 or 3 it has a reached a highly supercritical mass...
 
October 11th, 2006   Post 9
Damien435
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

No, what I am saying is that unless you have a certain amount of nuclear material nothing will happen. Nuclear weapons don't work like conventional explosives, you can take 1 gram of gunpowder and get a loud pop out of it, with Plutonium for example I believe the critical mass required to get a chain reaction and explosion is 10 kilograms. But don't quote me on that.
 
October 11th, 2006   Post 10
LIBERTY
Centurion
 
 
Well no matter if it was fake or not. It still made the UN and all their pants. So they really didnt accomplish much but put more strain on a country already consumed by poverty.

Last edited by LIBERTY; October 11th, 2006 at 03:03.
 



Similar Threads
North Korea Nuke Test Fans Fears in Asia
Korea tension: 60 shots fired
N. Korea Plans a Nuclear Test
Asia confronts North Korea on nuke test (AP)
N. Korea said readying missile test: US officials