| |
Topic: Kinetic Energy Weapons - realistic battlefield option? 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Click Here to Join us Today! FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery |
|
![]() |
| |
| | Post 11 |
| Primus Pilus | And maglev technology is awesome. |
| |
| | Post 12 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Milites Gregarius |
Yeah,power requirement is a big issue for those.
|
| |
| | Post 14 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
I had heard that the US Navy wanted to have a prototype on a ship by 2012 but that has been moved back to 2020 because of issues related to over heating caused by "firing" the weapon multiple times. Apparently the development of proper insulation and heat spreaders is years behind schedule, which one would think the insulation would be the easy part compared to say firing a 7kg projectile 200 miles without the use of black power. The Navy has moved away from steam catapults though and is using a magentic rail system similar to what you'd get on your maglevs in Europe.
__________________ Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere. My City |
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Primus Pilus |
7 kg? 200 miles? Unless it's guided, don't count on much accuracy. Though I think that MagLev is a great idea for launching jets off of carriers. |
| |