| |
| | Post 1 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; KALASHNIKOV VS M14Who is better |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Better at what? Its like comparing cows and apples. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | ok.Range,performance,jaming, how accurate they are,bullet velocity,effective range and stuff. |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | AK-47 Caliber 7.62x39 mm Action: Gas operated, rotating bolt with 2 lugs Overall length: 870 mm Barrel length: 415 mm Weight, with empty magazine: AK 4,3 kg; AKM 3,14 kg Magazine capacity 30 rounds (40 rounds box magazines and 75 rounds drums from RPK also may be used) Cyclic rate of fire 600 rounds per minute Maximum effective range: about 400 meters M-14 Caliber: 7.62x51 mm NATO (.308 Winchester) Action: Gas operated, rotating bolt Length: 1120 mm Barrel Length: 559 mm Weight loaded: 5,1 kg (6.6 kg M14A1) Magazine: 20 rounds, detachable box Rate of fire: 700 -750 rounds per minute |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Damn.youre good!!!! |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | lol I forgot to put my source. Just a little copy and paste. Great site, lots of great info and cool pictures. http://www.world.guns.ru/main-e.htm BTW, welcome to the forum |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Centurion | I'd take the AK-47 The AK-47, when you absolutly, positively have to kill every last mother in the room.
__________________ Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute -Samuel L. |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | thanks |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | i have been there before,didnt know that was your site though.Very good site!!! |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Its not my site, just was my source for that information. |
| |