Originally Posted by senojekips

That my friend is a two edged sword. Can you prove your links credible?

This is why I refuse to accept blogs and opinion columns as reputable/credible links and always try to link reputable organisations such as NASA or the British Antarctic Survey when dealing with these issues.

Originally Posted by MontyB

Do you have a point other than the right wing find global warming inconvenient because it affects profits?

So far in reading about 30 of those links I find blogs, petitions, Fox News, opinion columns in what look like small town online papers and a ton of pages from something called the "American Thinker" which seems preoccupied with pushing the McCain cause and bemoaning the UN and Environmentalists, not to mention a ton of dead links which leads me to believe you did none of this research yourself and more than likely copied it from another website (any chance you can give us that link).

Do you have any actual scientific papers (links of course) or are we to accept that peoples opinions of someone else work is acceptable proof?

Strange with in those links I see reports from the BBC, NASA, and other sources then FOX News and other "Right Wing Sources".

Originally Posted by 5.56X45mm

Strange with in those links I see reports from the BBC, NASA, and other sources then FOX News and other "Right Wing Sources".

Yes, but they dont touch the real issue. Its not about whether global warming is or isnt happening, and its not about whether its a natural thing. Its about how much humans are exacerbating it.

NASA Temperature-Records Revision
http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/200...ttest_yea.html

Facts are facts, it should "all" be included, especially if we're talking about something that can dictate national policy.

Originally Posted by WNxRogue

Yes, but they dont touch the real issue. Its not about whether global warming is or isnt happening, and its not about whether its a natural thing. Its about how much humans are exacerbating it.

I never said it's not real... I'm stating that we have no control over it. THE WORLD GETS HOTTER AND COLDER AND SO DOES THE FRAKKING SUN.

Originally Posted by 5.56X45mm

I never said it's not real... I'm stating that we have no control over it. THE WORLD GETS HOTTER AND COLDER AND SO DOES THE FRAKKING SUN.

Yes. The world gets hotter and colder. But. Does it get 20 degrees hotter, or 40? Thats my point. Its not about whether something is hotter or colder, its HOW MUCH hotter and colder WE CAUSE it to be.

See how that works?

Originally Posted by WNxRogue

Of course. You should never put forth evidence if you cant.

Well why do you doubt the sources that merely don't suit your point of view. If you want proof go and Google it yourself, why accuse those who disagree with your point of view as unable to support their sources.

Is it not true that you only said that because there were so many sources your argument appeared overwhelmed and you reasoned that it would silence your opposition??

It's the oldest ploy in the book to try and get one's opponent on the back foot defending his argument instead of promoting your own.

Impressive, Seno.

Originally Posted by AikiRooster

Facts are facts, it should "all" be included, especially if we're talking about something that can dictate national policy.

I can't argue with that.

The problem being in debates such as this, that they attract too many people with second agendas. They realise that there is no need to tell lies, just neglect to tell ALL of the truth.