1. 2008: The year the world will cool down
2. BBC Caught Editing Story To Appease Global Warming Lobbyist
3. The BBC Changes News to Accommodate Activist
4. Good science isn't about consensus
5. Academic cool on warming
6. Huge Dakota Oil Pool Could Change Energy Climate Debate By Dennis Avery
7. BBC heats up the climate news Special to the Financial Post
8. Geologist: Sun’s shift could mean global chill ‘Warming’ fits 30-year cycles, geologist argues JOHN STARK
9. Gore Admits Financial 'Stake' In Advancing Global Warming Hysteria
10. Revisiting the global warming-hurricane link
11. Gore Won't Ask Wealthy Hollywoodans to Alter Lifestyle to Save Planet
12. Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh Phil Chapman
13. Gore Used Fictional Video to Illustrate ‘Inconvenient Truth’
14. Jeb Bush Skeptical About Global Warming
15. Greenpeace founder now backs nuclear power
16. Walter E. Williams: Environmentalists' wild predictions
17. Hollywood Agenda: 'Day The Earth Stood Still' Remake Is All About Global Warming!
18. NASA Confirms Natural Climate Shift Marc Sheppard
19. Environmentalists' Wild Predictions
20. Washington Post Enlists Kids in Fight for Polar Bears Lacking key facts, Post asks young readers to decide if polar bears 'deserve' to be listed as endangered. By Genevieve Ebel
21. Gore Financially Invested in Climate Cause By Fred Lucas
22. Global warming may 'stop', scientists predict
23. You hippy-crites! When it comes to saving the planet do celebrities practise what they preach?
24. Cold Water Thrown on Antarctic Global-Warming Predictions
25. Study says global warming not worsening hurricanes
26. Global warming hysteria challenged Book reveals how controversial the science is on climate change
27. McCain Finds His Crisis in Global Warming By John Stossel
28. 'Grantsmanship' Distorts Global Warming Science By Jerome J. Schmitt
29. Myth of human CO2 causing warming or climate change The Unholy Alliance that manufactured Global Warming By Dr. Tim Ball
30. Over 31,000 U.S. scientists deny man-made global warming By Dennis T. Avery
31. Unlike Global Warming Alarmists, Hurricane Forecasters Now Deliberately Vague By P.J. Gladnick
32. Global warming: Upon further review it looks like a hoax
33. Roger F. Gay Global Warming: Has Anyone Noticed that it’s Over?
34. The end of the fake consensus on global warming Mark Milke
35. White House issues climate report 4 years late
36. Pouring cold water on climate report
37. Climate concern ripped as 'religion' Czech leader condemns it David R. Sands
38. Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System
39. Global Whining vs. the Truth By Brian Sussman
40. Gore Invests In Carbon Credit Company, Will Media Care?
41. Congressman Rohrabacher's Floor Speech on Global Warming Washington, May 14
42. Global Warming 'Alarmism' Is Hurting New Jersey Economy, Say Conservatives By Kevin Mooney
43. Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Arthur B. Robinson, Noah E. Robinson, and Willie Soon Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine

All of the links are of scientists, reporters, professors, and experts that are against the whole myth of Global Warming.

Do you have a point other than the right wing find global warming inconvenient because it affects profits?

So far in reading about 30 of those links I find blogs, petitions, Fox News, opinion columns in what look like small town online papers and a ton of pages from something called the "American Thinker" which seems preoccupied with pushing the McCain cause and bemoaning the UN and Environmentalists, not to mention a ton of dead links which leads me to believe you did none of this research yourself and more than likely copied it from another website (any chance you can give us that link).

Do you have any actual scientific papers (links of course) or are we to accept that peoples opinions of someone else work is acceptable proof?

Originally Posted by 5.56X45mm

All of the links are of scientists, reporters, professors, and experts that are against the whole myth of Global Warming.

Now, prove that every single one of those links is credible.





........


.......



And go.

Originally Posted by MontyB

Do you have a point other than the right wing find global warming inconvenient because it affects profits?

Sorry Monty, I can't agree with that at all.

Profits will never suffer, the consumer will pay for it. Believe me!!

After they are supposedly proven that they are not.

Don't even bother 5.56, let them do the work.

Originally Posted by AikiRooster

After it's proven that they are not.

As the one putting forth evidence, the task of proving credibility is on him.

Originally Posted by WNxRogue

Now, prove that every single one of those links is credible.





........


.......



And go.

That my friend is a two edged sword. Can you prove your links credible?

Originally Posted by MontyB

Do you have a point other than the right wing find global warming inconvenient because it affects profits?

Yes, I do have a point. My point is that those that want to push a false belief and use it as a method of control is wrong. As I have said. I'm for the environment. As a hunter and a fisherman, I better be or else there will be nothing left to the next generation of hunters and fishermen.

The use of Global Warming by the left is a clear sign of their stances as hypocrites. Al Gore.... the father of the modern day movement is a prime example of it.

His property uses twelve times more energy then the average American Household. He goes across the country in a private jet that is simply used to carry him and no one else. But he tells use to sell our trucks, stop using our TVs and live in caves while he is far more wasteful then the average American. He runs a business and has stock in businesses that are all about "carbon credits".

Strange that people bash President Bush and the Bush Family Ranch in Crawford Texas yet it is far more environmentally friendly then Gore's property. Everywhere I go I here people say that it's Bush's fault and that he's for destroying the environment. And you know what... it's the damn liberal leftists that spout this crap!

HOUSE # 1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated by gas. In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or Midwestern "snow belt," either. It's in the South.

HOUSE # 2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on arid high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion) is outside of Nashville, Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and filmmaker) Al Gore.

HOUSE # 2 (model eco-friendly house) is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas. Also known as "the Texas White House," it is the private residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp

TRUE

So in the end.... I'd rather be for the environment then have some watermelon (Environmentalist on the outside and a communist on the inside) telling me what the hell to do. I'm tired of the hypocrisy that the left spouts out of it's collective mouth and I am tired of being told how to live by those that think they now better then I do.

Originally Posted by senojekips

That my friend is a two edged sword. Can you prove your links credible?

Of course. You should never put forth evidence if you cant.

But he tells use to sell our trucks, stop using our TVs and live in caves

Really? I would love to see the quote of him saying we should live in caves.