| |
| | Post 21 | |||||
| Optio | Quote:
| |||||
| |
| | Post 22 |
| Primus Pilus | lol many of you think im a commie.. that is cool, nothing wrong with being called that, but how can i be one when my ideas are capatalist and i have always believed in the capatalist system about the united-statesvs china or unitedstates allies with china at this moment china and united states have a mutual relationship, each country is somewhat depended on each other. Americans earning alot of money while chinese have employment and development, alls well lol, if china takes back taiwan, id like to see if americans have the guts to defend the rebels
__________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too. |
| |
| | Post 23 |
| Optio | I don't forsee the Chinese taking back Taiwan any time soon. Any attack on Taiwan by the Chinese would probably cause economic sanctions and China would not want that at all. |
| |
| | Post 24 |
| Primus Pilus | Creating economic sanctions against China would not occur because already millions of foreign investors are investing in China. If a trade bloc was to occur, the global economy would surely go through a very very turbulent time. This is known as Tit for tat policies, whose actions are to be effected by another. I've been reading several articles of Taiwan's KMT Cheif Lein Chan visiting the mainland which made both sides to reconsider for peace talks again. There is a high hopes for a peaceful settlement between the two parties. Report: http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=8357995
__________________ ![]() Cogito ergo sum |
| |
| | Post 25 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
__________________ Infantry leads...... | |
| |
| | Post 26 | ||
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
Challenging against China militarily is not a wise thing to do and I'm quite sure the Pentagon is fully aware of that. | ||
| |
| | Post 27 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
Millions invested by Westerners and others .... well those parties knew that they were investing in a potential bust. They knew in advance that if relations between their nations and China went to hell in a hand basket, they'd probably lose everything they invested. All investors who were not aware of the small chance of losing everything on the investing into China are incredibly naive (if they even exist ... doubty it). Make no mistake, if its Japan that is being attacked, every Western power goes to war with China over it. That is one thing that is quite clear I should hope.
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase | |
| |
| | Post 28 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 29 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Right, they knew that they stood to make a ton of money if everything went well. That's how you rapidly grow your business: Taking risks. Still, the people with all the money tied up in China are not in a position to stop their governments from imposing sanctions, and their government leaders would look very corrupt if there was any chance of the press coming out with "Prime Minister Bob turns a blind eye to Taiwan invasion to feed his greed for illegal bribes." Ultimately you are correct in the statement that it would be a huge loss in trade for everyone. But it just so happens that the USA and her allies are not motivated only by money. There is also the part where self interest and general ethics dictate that keeping China in check if and when she turns aggressive is a good idea. Doing nothing could be seen as completely stupid. |
| |
| | Post 30 |
| Primus Pilus | A military blockade seems to be the only reasonable option for a response if anything should happen although I do not agree the idea of an Economic Sanction. An Economic Sanction would not simply stop China. Thus it is very difficult to impose one as well. |
| |