Topic: japanese writer suggests few ways to defend aginist china 2

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
May 1st, 2005   Post 11
MadeInChina
Primus Pilus
 
yes temperaly, but not for long

china and unitedstates could never become long term allies

as demostrated, 2 superpowers cannot be allies

one tries to backstab another while the other thinks up of a plan to backstab the other
__________________
A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too.
 
May 1st, 2005   Post 12
MadeInChina
Primus Pilus
 
yes temperaly, but not for long

china and unitedstates could never become long term allies

as demostrated, 2 superpowers cannot be allies

one tries to backstab another while the other thinks up of a plan to backstab the other
 
May 1st, 2005   Post 13
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

China isn't a superpower.
 
May 1st, 2005   Post 14
MontyB
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
China isn't a superpower.
Yet.

Quote:
Sounds like something you would hear back in the 1950's, during the cold war in my opinion. Don't you love propaganda and scare tactics?
Yep its the kind of paranoid thinking that leads to the creation of another cold war.

Unfortunately the guy that wrote it is somewhat prone to tunnel vision as he only see's the US and China as the two waring "superpowers" what he isnt looking at is the economic/military and population growth of areas such as India and European Union it is entirely possible that in the future the world will have multiple "superpowers" to offset any single agressive one.
__________________
Faith is a cop-out. If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can’t be taken on its own merits.

- Dan Barker, "Losing Faith in Faith", 1992
 
May 1st, 2005   Post 15
rkmac48
Milites Gregarius
 
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.


Another tragic lession in history - when a politician who has no inkling of military strategy tries to run the war effort, pandemonium ensues, sooner or later.

In this case, it ensued later; unfortunately, what was later to them is sooner to us. Now we have to deal with it.
__________________
Check out my website!

http://www.journalofhistory.com/

Online formum as well... click on the \"Online Forum\" link to get to it! Sign up today!
 
May 2nd, 2005   Post 16
Arclight
Optio
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.
 
May 2nd, 2005   Post 17
rkmac48
Milites Gregarius
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.

Feel free to check out my forum - www.journalofhistory.com - and join the online forum. It'd be great to have a new member and start a discussion on such a topic!
 
May 2nd, 2005   Post 18
Arclight
Optio
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.
That is only if we could win. The Soviets could put up a good fight in Europe and the Chinese in Asia.
 
May 2nd, 2005   Post 19
EagleZtrike
Centurion
 
 
China aint bent on world conquest.

If the US actually made an effort China could be a long term ally and good ones at that. They couldn't stay allied to Russia because they had a corrupt leader and a rebellious government/society.
 
May 2nd, 2005   Post 20
rkmac48
Milites Gregarius
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.
That is only if we could win. The Soviets could put up a good fight in Europe and the Chinese in Asia.
Yeah, but we had nukes. The soviets did too, thanks to the Rosenbergs... but we'd have wiped them out. The U.N. may actually have been useful back then - likely, it would have supported a massive effort to stop China and Company.