| |
| | Post 1 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; Japan’s New Ship: Destroyer or Carrier?Japan’s New Ship: Destroyer or Carrier? Launch of Vessel Prompted by China’s Growing Submarine Force By WENDELL MINNICK, TAIPEI Japan’s launch of a helicopter-carrying destroyer may signal its ambition to expand its naval capabilities and eventually join international coalitions abroad. The 13,500-ton DDH 181 Hyuga, launched on Aug. 23 at the IHI Marine United shipyard in Yokohama, was viewed by some as Japan’s first aircraft carrier since World War II. http://www.defensenews.com/story.php...0171&C=landwar |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | And it was made under extreme security as well. They don't even have public photos of it. And this was a Japanese carrier. A basic carrier but a carrier nonetheless. If Japan is purchasing JSFs, the Marine Corps version that is, this will be no different than an aircraft carrier. I think ultimately that is their goal.
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED ![]() Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; JSFI was thinking JSFs to when I read this, it right there between the line. |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | The Japanese have always had this thing for hybrid warships. The last IJN Hyuga was a Hybrid Aircraft Carrier-Battleship during WWII. This quote caught my eye... “The Hyuga is a big step forward to demonstrate Japan’s capability to construct full-fledged aircraft carriers in the future.” "In the Future"? Does Japan plan on building CV's or CVN's? Found a Photo, she doesn't look like a Destroyer to me... ![]()
__________________ "My center is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent. I shall attack." -Foch I get this question a lot. I am from NYC. I fly a French flag because I work for the Paris Office of a International company. Last edited by mmarsh; September 4th, 2007 at 20:49. |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | That right there is definitely a flat top. |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | ..she definatly a flat-top, however she has no catapults and she looks too small for fixed wing. F-35 SVOTL perhaps? I might take a strictly hypothetical guess and say she is a testbed for a future CV or CVN design. It makes sense for the Japanese to want carriers. She required a powerful Naval strike ability and most of the major powers in the area already have them, are are planning to get them. |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | The Chinese want a carrier fleet, the Japanese want a carrier fleet... at least they want to be ready for it when the day comes that their Self Defense Force is reorganized as the Defense Force (no, really, that's the name they're looking to go by). From eyeballing it, that top doesn't look too much smaller than any Tarawa Class Amphibious Assault Ship. Japan's not the only one. South Korea has already launched their version called the RoKS DodkDo and there are two more of the class that will be built. Funny thing though is South Korea is not slated to recieve any F-35s. Anyways, this Hyuga class "Destroyer" has a greater displacement than the HMS Invincible, if that gives you any comparison. The Invicible was a Harrier operating aircraft carrier. |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Optio | This ship draws a lot of comparisons in my mind to the Royal Navy's Invincible class. We call them (the Invincibles) light aircraft carriers now, but when they were made there was so much opposition against building carriers that they were called "Flush Deck Cruisers". Very similar to these ships being called "destroyers". Is there any opposition to CV's by the Japanese people or government? Or are they trying to make their re-entry into the Carrier Club a little discreet? Japan has given no word if these will carry F-35, but that's ridiculously obvious that they will. The ship can accommodate 11 aircraft in the hangar, but is only carrying 4 helicopters. Hm... I wonder what the extra space is for... The only surprising thing to me is that they didn't build a ski-jump on it so the future F-35s can make STOVLs more easily.
__________________ Midshipman Third Class Trojan Battalion NROTC Last edited by chronoserpent; September 21st, 2007 at 05:34. |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | I guess a ski jump at this point would be too obvious. Japan is looking to be a world super power once again. There is quite a desire in Japan to own a nuclear weapon. |
| |
| | Post 10 | |||
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ If horses would have hands and could paint with their hands and create works of art like the humans, then horses would form and paint the gods with the shape of horses and they would build sculptures according to their own bodies. - Xenophanes Last edited by MontyB; September 20th, 2007 at 21:05. | |||
| |
![]() |