Topic: It's the news media now ..... 6

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
April 6th, 2006   Post 51
Chief Bones
Forums Grumpy Old Man
 
 
Gear


Post; Don't be manure stupid now ...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Bones
Mod Edit: Removed. I suggest you read the forum rules. Numbers 1, 4 and 5 more specifically.
Sorry for the Mod Edit above ... I got carried away a little bit ... it happens to all of us once in awhile ...

I removed the rest of the post myself ...

Last edited by Chief Bones; April 7th, 2006 at 07:37.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 52
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Bones
no where did I say that I don't recognize the Electoral College.
No, you didn't specifically say that.

But you did say:

Quote:
POTUS was named by the Electoral College (after the Supremes sang along party lines) and we are stuck with King George.
Which to me, implies you don't recognize that the EC is the election authority. If the EC choose Bush (and it did), it is impossible to say he wasn't elected without refusing to recognize them and their purpose.

But, oh well.
__________________
Ugh.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 53
Rob Henderson
Milforum Idol
 
 
Right, but the popular vote influences the Electoral College(most of the time)
__________________
C/1Lt Ret. Henderson
"Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think."- Fortune Cookie
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 54
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by C/2Lt Henderson
Right, but the popular vote influences the Electoral College(most of the time)
And the EC chose Bush, therefore, Bush was elected.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 55
FULLMETALJACKET
MilForum Bad Apple
 
 
Gear


Quote:
And the EC chose Bush, therefore, Bush was elected.
TRUE.
This might be off subject for this page but i saw some stuff about it on page 1. I would just like to say that, as 17 year old Male growing up in 75% Republican town, and a future Marine, That I support and watch every Bush speech that he makes. The Media is turning this into another Vietnam. My MSGT read a letter to my class about a week ago that was written in 2005 by a Guy in the ARNG over in Iraq, he spoke of just the issue of the Media. and he spoke of the good that has come from this war.
*Thousands of Children have been updated on Shots.
*Sewage sytems have been put into all the major cities.
*Thousands of people have clean water now for the first time.
*The School Attendence rate has gone up from 20% to 80%.
*Females are able to go to school for the first time.
*Elections have been held.
*For the first time in 30 years there are textbooks in the schools that dont even mention Saddam.
These are just a few things he mentioned. These are the things the media doesnt tell you. These are the things you should be hearing because the truth is, you dont watch the news to hear about how the people have clean water, that doesnt get your attention. 9 soldiers killed,Ied kills 4 soldiers, helicopter crashes kills the whole crew. This is what makes headlines and keeps the media going.
As i mentioned before about the town i live in, Ocala, FL. Ive watched in a short time of 3 months the number of protestors grow there were 3 people holding "out of Iraq" signs a few months ago. yesterday i see a crowd 20 + people. and one Vet standing about 40 feet in front of them down the road holding a support our troops sign. Thats the person i respect, because he's been there, he knows war, he doesnt watch it on tv, people sit here and complain, they have that freedom because of war, everything we have in this life is earned in blood. I just want them to go home, so that when the common soldier comes home he can still feel like he made a difference and still hold some dignity for himself. Thank you to all who have taken time to read this.
N. McAlister
__________________
"For Democracy, any man would give his only begotten son."
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 56
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by FULLMETALJACKET
*Thousands of Children have been updated on Shots.
*Sewage sytems have been put into all the major cities.
*Thousands of people have clean water now for the first time.
*The School Attendence rate has gone up from 20% to 80%.
*Females are able to go to school for the first time.
*Elections have been held.
*For the first time in 30 years there are textbooks in the schools that dont even mention Saddam.
Some of this is true, some is a little misrepresented/inflated.

Females were able to attend school in Iraq prior to the invasion.

School attendence is right now, about 65% (I think that was the last UNICEF number), so it's dropped a little (73%). Which is to be expected given the political climate some areas are in. However, teacher salaries have been raised, and new materials have been sent, so while there is a slight decline, those attending are getting a better education, and specific areas are increasing attendance rates.

All of the text books I've seen do mention Hussein (he is a part of Iraqi history, after all), but not as the ultimate prime higher being like before.

As for sewage systems, that runs hot and cold. They dump a lot of their sewage into the rivers, and a lot ends up in the streets as well due to faulty pumps/sepitcs. Most of the plants are being refurbished, new pumps put in etc, so it is getting better, but these things take time. Esp since the sewage system there was so bad.

As for clean water, that's true. Electricity is also getting better, it is above pre-war levels now. Which is a feat considering the insurgents like to attack electrical sources.

Health care is getting better too, though still has room for improvement. 95% of kids under five have been vaccinated for polio.

So, there are positives to Iraq and you don't even need propaganda to support them.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 57
Marinerhodes
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

I find it remarkable that the POTUS (and all applicable offices) do not "toot their own horn" and point out all the positives in view of all the negatives. I see the information released (I guess) but I don't see the political parties jumping in and saying "look at what we did, this is what makes up for all the rest".

That does not seem to me like a person that is trying to direct your attention away from something that may be going wrong.
__________________
Quote:
I am like Radio Shack. You have questions? I have answers!
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 58
CABAL
Primus Pilus
 
 
Gear

Media and News Agencies consists of several people who have personal values and perspectives which they see as right.
We have those who lean to the far right and those who lean to the far left. Since when did the news media in America become a hotspot for far right and left wing propaganda spewing hateful words against George W. Bush and Dick Cheney? This so-called "right to freedom of press" have seriously gotten out of hand and have entered into a realm of hateful defamation.
There are reporters who write articles and transcripts without supporting their thesis with concrete and credible evidence. There are also reporters using misleading and strong words driving the American people to fear and contempt. They welcome unwarranted influences of personal values and ideals without using neutrality regardless if the evidence and statistics goes against their beliefs.

As the US Framers and James Madison have emphasized that People who often behave in "passion" without using "reasoning" are likely to be the most dangerous.
__________________


Cogito ergo sum
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 59
Rob Henderson
Milforum Idol
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marinerhodes
I find it remarkable that the POTUS (and all applicable offices) do not "toot their own horn" and point out all the positives in view of all the negatives. I see the information released (I guess) but I don't see the political parties jumping in and saying "look at what we did, this is what makes up for all the rest".
I agree. I would be doing everything I could to put out the media "fires" that they always inevitably create...But bad news sells...Good news gets boring quick...thats the way the news and other media mediums will always operate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marinerhodes
That does not seem to me like a person that is trying to direct your attention away from something that may be going wrong.
Sure doesn't.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 60
Pop-a-squat
Milites Gregarius
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by CABAL
Media and News Agencies consists of several people who have personal values and perspectives which they see as right.
We have those who lean to the far right and those who lean to the far left. Since when did the news media in America become a hotspot for far right and left wing propaganda spewing hateful words against George W. Bush and Dick Cheney? This so-called "right to freedom of press" have seriously gotten out of hand and have entered into a realm of hateful defamation.
There are reporters who write articles and transcripts without supporting their thesis with concrete and credible evidence. There are also reporters using misleading and strong words driving the American people to fear and contempt. They welcome unwarranted influences of personal values and ideals without using neutrality regardless if the evidence and statistics goes against their beliefs.

As the US Framers and James Madison have emphasized that People who often behave in "passion" without using "reasoning" are likely to be the most dangerous.
CABAL, that is probably right on the money. I'm getting tired of seeing nothing but carnage and sensationalized stories being reported, myself. The media in general needs to gets its act together, in my opinion.