| |
| | Post 31 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
that thing ever see combat??? | |
| |
| | Post 32 | ||
| Centurion | Quote:
Probably it was an answer to the Maus tank or Royal Tiger tank.>>>but I'm only guessing here. And that actually doesn't seem like a tank to me...more like a tank destroyer>>>note the absence of a rotating turret. | ||
| |
| | Post 33 |
| Master Gunner | |
| |
| | Post 34 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Yup. Five built tow left. One at Aberdeen and one here. And yes they where the awnser to the Tiger and King Tiger. 105mm gun. 152mm cannon/launcher, M551 ARV.
__________________ F.O. Seaman CAP/USAFAUX DoA/DHS Administration Officer Golden Armor Composite Squadron, 15077 Fort Knox, Kentucky 40121 ![]() |
| |
| | Post 35 |
| Primus Pilus | How does the M1A1 compare against the merkava (sp?) and leopard 2A4, as the egyptians have M1A1, wud they be able to compete against an older leopard 2 such as the A4 or would the leopard 1 be a better comparison? |
| |
| | Post 36 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
__________________ Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute -Samuel L. | |
| |
| | Post 37 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Well, the Egyptian M1A1's are older and don't have their proper upgrades. Also the Mk.4 Merkava has good protection, but as Kozzy said the M289 series would blow it all to hell. All Leopards are comparable but can be destroyed by the M1A1 in particular the 2A4. Th A2 SEP is the top of the line, then Merkava Mk.4, then Leopard 2, then Challenger 2. I like the idea that the Merkava Mk.3 can be used as a APC if needs be. |
| |
| | Post 38 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Never really used that way.
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 39 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
I wouldn't use "blow it all to hell" either. The Mk 4 would be penetrated, but it definitely wouldn't explode. The crew would have a good chance of survival. | |
| |
| | Post 40 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | yep |
| |