Topic: Info on German 88mm Anti Tank Shells please. I found one...

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology > Military Ammunition and Explosives Discussions
User Name
Password

 
August 30th, 2006   Post 1
edrob357
Milites Gregarius
 

Post; Info on German 88mm Anti Tank Shells please. I found one...


Yesterday up behind Utah Beach I found what appears to be a german 88mm Anti tank shell. Can anyone help me with specific dimensions etc, of the different type of anti tank shells that the Germans were using and had available to them in 1944 or point me to a website, please?

There were at least 12 88s of different types (Pak 43/41 definitly and Flak 36 and Flak 37, to the best of my knowledge) within 3 miles of where I found it behind Stutzpunkt 9 at Les Dunes de Varaville (a couple of miles North of the Landing Point).

I'll post some potos and stuff tonight.
 
August 30th, 2006   Post 2
5.56X45mm
100% Space Shuttle Door Gunner
 
 
Gear


I wouldn't touch the stuff, it could be 60 years old and still blow up.
__________________


"Poor People have been voting for Democrats for the last 50 years... and they're still poor." - Charles Barkley

 
August 30th, 2006   Post 3
systemlord
Optio
 
 
Gear

Well, there is a lot of Ammunition, that was used by the 88s.

For the 88mm Pak 43:
- Panzergranate 39, PanzeGranate 39/43, PanzerGranate 40/43, Sprenggranate, Sprenggranate 43, Granate 39 HL, Granate 39/43 HL

For the 88mm Pak 43/41:
-
Panzergranate 39, PanzeGranate 39/43, PanzerGranate 40/43, Sprenggranate, Sprenggranate 43

For the 88mm Flak 18, 36, 37, 37/41 and 41:
- Sprenggranatpatrone L/4,5 (Kz.) and some kind of Panzergranate



The only thing I know about specific dimensions is, that the Sprengranatpatrone for the 88mm Flak had an overall length of about 981 mm.

I'm looking forward to see the Photos, maybe there is some marking left on the shell.
__________________
"I'm going to find it and I'm going to destroy it. Possibly with dynamite."

"The loudest noises in a life are a CLICK, if you want to hear a BOOM and a BOOM if you want to hear a CLICK."

Last edited by systemlord; August 30th, 2006 at 19:20.
 
August 30th, 2006   Post 4
edrob357
Milites Gregarius
 
It is 62 years old, but if the cows walking all over the bunker complex where I found it haven't set off the mines etc, then I'll take my chances. There was virtually no explosive power in an armor piercing round anyway. It's just a massive big lump of case hardened tungsten steel.

It weighs just under 8 kilos, but it is too rusty to have any visible markings on it. It is about 220-225 mm (approx) long and 88-90mm in diameter. I'm inclined to think it's a panzergranate 39, but I'd need to get the specs for the shell.

Here's some photos, too. Not the best, but they'll have to do to start off with. There's a foot ruler in (some of) the pictures for scale.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp 88antitank003c.bmp (33.4 KB, 31 views)

Last edited by edrob357; August 30th, 2006 at 20:32.
 
August 30th, 2006   Post 5
systemlord
Optio
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by edrob357
I
It weighs just under 8 kilos, but it is too rusty to have any visible markings on it. It is about 220-225 mm (approx) long and 88-90mm in diameter.
O.k. then it's definitely no Ammo for the 88mm Flak.

http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/t...88mm-flak.html

I'll try to find out something more about the Panzergranaten for 88mm Pak.

Last edited by systemlord; August 30th, 2006 at 20:25.
 
August 30th, 2006   Post 6
edrob357
Milites Gregarius
 
It's a solid shot hardened steel round with only a tiny space for the explosive filling. The Pak 43/41 fired a high velocity 88mm anti tank round weighing 7.3 kg (PanzerGranate 40/43 or Panzergranate 39, can't remember which), which is probably what mine would weigh if I cleaned all the crap off it. No?

Last edited by edrob357; August 30th, 2006 at 20:40.
 
August 30th, 2006   Post 7
systemlord
Optio
 
 
Gear

Yeah could be. I'll ask a friend of me tomorrow. He has more experience with 88s than I do.
 
August 31st, 2006   Post 8
AussieNick
Forum Digger
 
 
Gear

Whatever it is I would not be playing around with it.
As we are told with all UXO's, don't touch them, move the ground around them or allow your shadow to fall on them.

They may be old, but they still kill.
__________________
Platoon Commander, 6 Platoon, B Company
10/27th Battalion
Royal South Australia Regiment

PRO PATRIA
 
August 31st, 2006   Post 9
systemlord
Optio
 
 
Gear

As we say in Germany: "Wer suchet der findet, wer draufhaut verschwindet!"
(Who search finds it, who strikes it disappears!)
 
August 31st, 2006   Post 10
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Indeed. No ordnance is safe until rendered safe by a professional or it explodes, after which it is perfectly safe to handle but not before.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
"Tommy's Dictionary Of The Trenches" WWI
Germany the guardian of peace
Best Tank of WW2
Funny Fact
I want Redleg banned.