| |
| | Post 1 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | Post; Hunters and the ArmyOkay here's a new thread because the other was getting off topic. Here's my opinion. Hunters or a hunting background will be really good because first, you're already acclimated to the outdoors. This can be quite a big shock to others. You already know some nice little tricks and things that can keep you going longer. You know how to maintain your kit as well. You develop an eye for the enviorns. If something isn't where it's supposed to be, chances are you'll be the first to spot it. For most people trees all look alike. To a skilled hunter, he could call a fake camouflage tree or one that just wasn't there the other day. Also being experienced in shooting, it makes marksmanship a snap. Though hunting in itself won't turn you into a good infantryman, the skills you learn there can be applied and it's a good combination.
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED ![]() Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | you could probably add boyscouts into your agrument. There are a lot of skills that I got from the boyscouts that I use in the military. But yes, being a hunter can aid a soldier.
__________________ "The best form of taking care of troops is first-class training, for this saves unnecessary casualties." Erwin Rommel |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Many skills learned from hunting can be beneficial, while many, like shooting for instance, can often times hurt - especially when it comes to long range target interdiction. Bad habits die hard. |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase | |
| |
| | Post 5 | ||
| Buttercup ![]() | Although I only have any real experience with one side of this, I do believe that hunting (and the BSA) can be very beneficial to a serviceman, as far as a general idea of fieldcraft (basic movement, although I think I've only lowcrawled while hunting once So, yes, hunting CAN give the hunter certain skills that will benefit him as a Soldier, but most likely it will not make him a romanticized Audie Murphy type frontiersman. edit: Quote:
That help at all?
__________________ No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen. | ||
| |
| | Post 6 | ||
| Optio | Quote:
Invariably, hunters make the best snipers not only because of their marksmanship but because of their ability to be cohesive to their environment, the woodlands. Some people may concede that a hunter has the potential to be a good soldier, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he will. Those people say that hunting and killing deer, for example, is much easier than killing a human because deer do not shoot back. I disagree; if the soldier(s) cannot spot you they cannot kill you - unless they are indiscriminately using artillery. When I am out hunting, many times I see other hunters that pass by me, whether I am in a tree or on ground; and they never see me. I have had people get so close to me that I could spit on them and they never see me because human senses are very dull. On the other hand, behold the the senses of a white tail deer : her hearing, sight, and smell are hundreds of times better than a human’s. When shooting a wild deer that is in a heavily hunted area (not these corn feed farm deer you see on hunting channels), her nerves are always on the edge and she can actually move a little before the bullet gets there; and the rest of the deer in the area will immediately know where you are and haul-ass at 30-35mph in the opposite direction. In contrast, well trained soldiers will hit the dirt, find cover, and listen for the snap (bullet passing by) and crack (muzzle blast) of the shot so they can locate that sniper, but by that time, two soldiers are likely fallen victim. Most men will panic and fire in different areas, but that has a small chance of hitting anything as the sniper places his shots where they count. And exceptional sniper can wipe out a whole squad or platoon of men if they are unsupported. Case study: Carlos Hathcock. They guy was about as far away from a typical marine as one could get; he used all the techniques he learned hunting to bag his "quarry". Quote:
| ||
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Buttercup ![]() | And you have what experience exactly to back these claims up? |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Optio | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Buttercup ![]() | You sound like you have some special experience both with the military in general and sharpshooting/sniping in particular, I am curious as to what personal experience you have with the subject upon which you are basing your conclusions about hunters and their military abilities. |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Optio | I am just a citizen, an avid hunter, and a gun enthusiast. I visit the local range each week to shoot; and it’s usually with my bench rest rifles, but I do have experience with military style shooting. I compete in the high power rifle competition which is bi-annual for us, and usually shoot expert. I have competed against people that are in the service and they have their military style, but I have been able to beat all of them except for my dad, who is a former 101st Airborne sniper. He usually shoots better than what a standard AR-15 (M16A2) is capable of shooting. I have learned a great deal about the military because I talk to my dad and all the vets who show up at the range. I shoot high power rifle competition with these I shot this little 3-shot group at 100 yards with my M1A (iron sights) on a bench (I took a 6 Oclock hold) It went straight to my head, so fogive me for the "bighead" This is not me, but it is basically my mentality |
| |