Topic: Heavy-Lift Airships?

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology > Naval Surface Vessels and Submarines Discussions
User Name
Password

 
February 19th, 2006   Post 1
raspsa
Milites Gregarius
 

Post; Heavy-Lift Airships?


I like the idea of being ableto airlift 500-1000 tons of soldiers and equipment straight into the field. I hope the concept proves feasible.

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...ound/index.php
 
February 19th, 2006   Post 2
LeEnfield
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

But it would make one hell of a target, now a C7 could drop a hundred men in a few seconds at six hundred feet and they would all be on the ground in six seconds. Just how long would it take an airship to come into land and to get every one off.
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
February 20th, 2006   Post 3
CanadianCombat
Centurion
 
 
Gear

those airships would only be useful in a controled combat zone, because they pose to big of a target and are to slow.
__________________
If we don't end war,war will end us.
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 4
tomtom22
Chief Engineer
 
 
Gear

I agree with Le Enfield. Furthermore as Canadian Combat said they would make alovely target for the RPG-7 and other weapons of that sort.
__________________
"It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 5
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

They've been toying around with using them for intra-theater transport. I think the project is functionally dead since i really haven't heard anything promissing out of it since 2003 I think. I may be wrong but nothing has hit my ears.

Canadian and tomtom - Airships where turned to in the wake of the LONG time it took to deploy back in desert storm as perhaps a quicker solution than ships and a more cost effective solution than airplanes. They arn't meant to fly over enemy territory.
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 6
tomtom22
Chief Engineer
 
 
Gear

In today's battlefields, enemy or friendly territory is hard to define.
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 7
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomtom22
In today's battlefields, enemy or friendly territory is hard to define.
No, it really isn't. How many soldiers did we lose to enemy fire while staging for Afghanistan and Iraq? Combined less than the 92' Gulf War if I'm not mistaken.
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 8
PJ24
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
No, it really isn't. How many soldiers did we lose to enemy fire while staging for Afghanistan and Iraq? Combined less than the 92' Gulf War if I'm not mistaken.
You mean '91. They just had to put that "2" beside the "1," sheesh!

__________________
Ugh.
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 9
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

hah! Imagine there is this big airplane which can tranport whole battalion of army into the battlefront! It would be an awesome site!
__________________

- Ready To Strike -
 
February 20th, 2006   Post 10
sandy
Primus Pilus
 
Gear


Graf zeppelin again?
From my view,those airship can,t trasport battlefr ont because of weakness.
However, career airplane is also the same as this point.