Heavy-Lift Airships?

About Heavy-Lift Airships?


  International Military Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Forums > Naval Surface Vessels and Submarines Discussions
User Name
Password

 
February 19th, 2006   #1
raspsa
 

Heavy-Lift Airships? info


I like the idea of being ableto airlift 500-1000 tons of soldiers and equipment straight into the field. I hope the concept proves feasible.

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...ound/index.php
 
February 19th, 2006   #2
LeEnfield
 
 
But it would make one hell of a target, now a C7 could drop a hundred men in a few seconds at six hundred feet and they would all be on the ground in six seconds. Just how long would it take an airship to come into land and to get every one off.


LeEnfield Rides again

 
February 20th, 2006   #3
CanadianCombat
 
 
those airships would only be useful in a controled combat zone, because they pose to big of a target and are to slow.
 
February 20th, 2006   #4
tomtom22
 
 
I agree with Le Enfield. Furthermore as Canadian Combat said they would make alovely target for the RPG-7 and other weapons of that sort.


"It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations
 
February 20th, 2006   #5
Whispering Death
 
 
They've been toying around with using them for intra-theater transport. I think the project is functionally dead since i really haven't heard anything promissing out of it since 2003 I think. I may be wrong but nothing has hit my ears.

Canadian and tomtom - Airships where turned to in the wake of the LONG time it took to deploy back in desert storm as perhaps a quicker solution than ships and a more cost effective solution than airplanes. They arn't meant to fly over enemy territory.
 
February 20th, 2006   #6
tomtom22
 
 
In today's battlefields, enemy or friendly territory is hard to define.
 
February 20th, 2006   #7
Whispering Death
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomtom22
In today's battlefields, enemy or friendly territory is hard to define.
No, it really isn't. How many soldiers did we lose to enemy fire while staging for Afghanistan and Iraq? Combined less than the 92' Gulf War if I'm not mistaken.
 
February 20th, 2006   #8
PJ24
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
No, it really isn't. How many soldiers did we lose to enemy fire while staging for Afghanistan and Iraq? Combined less than the 92' Gulf War if I'm not mistaken.
You mean '91. They just had to put that "2" beside the "1," sheesh!



Ut ceteri vivant.
 
February 20th, 2006   #9
zander_0633
 
 
hah! Imagine there is this big airplane which can tranport whole battalion of army into the battlefront! It would be an awesome site!



- Ready To Strike -
 
February 20th, 2006   #10
sandy
 
Graf zeppelin again?
From my view,those airship can,t trasport battlefr ont because of weakness.
However, career airplane is also the same as this point.