| |
| | Post 11 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
Lets try and look at this from an average Palestinians point of view (For right or wrong) they have grown up in what a little more than refugee camps they are taught to hate Israel and its followers because they see them as occupiers of "THEIR" (remember the for right or wrong bit at the start) land, a group enters the political race that has a record of fighting those they dislike and on top of that where they have been elected to office the towns are flourishing why wouldnt they elect Hamas? Personally I dont care anymore who is right and who is wrong if it was my choice I would nuke the entire middle east and move on with life.
__________________ We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld | |
| |
| | Post 12 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
The biggest problem that many people who are products of "liberal" societies have is that they judge things by their motivations, not results. Last edited by Whispering Death; January 27th, 2006 at 04:21. | |
| |
| | Post 13 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 14 | |
| Forums Grumpy Old Man | Post; Open your eyesQuote:
Hamas has played the very same race card to come to power - "The dirty Jews are to blame for the Palestinian people's problems". WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? | |
| |
| | Post 15 | |||
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
What I am blaming Europe for is being totaly anti-Israel and grossly pro-palestinian. Their massive funding and favor for the Palestinians is what fuelled these organizations to go on and thrive in Palestine. Had the Europeans have not done that, most of the Palestinians would have been disillutioned with thier own system which could provide them with he basic needs of government and would have been more willing to seek a peaceful solution with Israel in order to improve their lives. Instead their lives were kept up by an outside source (Europe) which went along with their current lifestyle which is to fight Israel. I'm not against Europe supporting democracy. But regarding the kind of thinking that left-wing Europe engages, the people they should be supporting they rail against, and the ones they should watch out for they support. And now look what you get! Why would European public oppinion be so strongly against the only true democracy in that region, and support people with shady agendas who have whose only tract record is terrorism. Its probably alot to do with left-wing idealism which Europe has emersed itself in which is proving time and time again to have no sound basis in reality. Its really stupid if you look at it, no wonder they are sealing their own doom. Quote:
The EU is the biggest money donator to the palestinians. ...here Bory said it best Quote:
Last edited by gladius; January 27th, 2006 at 05:38. | |||
| |
| | Post 16 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
__________________ | |
| |
| | Post 17 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 18 |
| Centurion | Who is Hamas appointing as Prime Minister ?, if you want a good idea of what the future holds, find out his opinions.
__________________ "Even if I wished to surrender to you - and I don't - I am commanding Australian's who would cut my throat if I accepted your Terms" Colonel C Hore, Siege of Elands River, 1900 If You want to See the Future, Read a History Book |
| |
| | Post 19 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | It really doesn't matter who the PM would be as much as who the leader of Hamas is... and honestly I can see the guy in my head but for the life of me I can't remember hardly any arab names! Just do a google search and you can find out all the anti-israel beliefs he holds, and he's really in charge. He assumed power becase Israel killed everyone above him through targeted assasinations. So this guy is the "nice" Hamas guy because Israel can't prove beyond the shadow of a doubt he's a terrorist. |
| |
| | Post 20 | ||
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
Its the fruition of an over simplified Occams razor principle in that the The simplest explanation is usually the best. Quote:
Godwin's Law [Usenet] “As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.” There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful. http://www.answers.com/topic/godwin-s-law Essentially it is possible to draw comparisons with any nation/leader and the Nazi's or Hitler therefore the comments can not be taken seriously. | ||
| |