MontyB
All-Blacks Supporter
Nuclear weapons are of an indescriminant mass destruction nature.
And whats wrong with someone owning a Bradley IFV or a tank? There are lots of people in the US who collect working tanks with working guns with proper BATF paperwork.
So you are saying there is some form of control on these items?
Can you find me an instance where a legal privately owned machinegun, grenade launcher, .50 caliber rifle, tank, IFV, fighter jet, was used to kill someone in the US?
Would the "Al Capone" era / St Valentines day Massacre count?
I can see your point but I would argue that the reason these weapons are "rarely" used to kill is that they are restricted if you remove those restrictions their use will increase not decrease because of availability (1920s and 30s USA is a good example of what limited control/unrestricted gun access can do).
Over all I agree with Chief Bones on the this issue, I don't support the banning of weapons I do support their regulation though.