| |
Topic: "Gun Control" 2 |
![]() |
|
| View Poll Results :What sort of government control should there be on firearms? | |||
| None...at all. | | 1 | 2.38% |
| Convicted criminals shouldn't have firearms, but there should be very few other restrictions. | | 14 | 33.33% |
| No ownership of military grade weapons (explosive devices, select fire, etc.). | | 6 | 14.29% |
| All firearms should be registered. | | 17 | 40.48% |
| Hunting weapons should be allowed, and they should be under lock and key. | | 3 | 7.14% |
| All firearms should be in the hands of the governement. No civilian should ever own firearms. | | 0 | 0% |
| I live under a rock. In my slice of utopia, evil guns don't exist. | | 1 | 2.38% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| |
| | Post 11 |
| Forum Digger | Or as one of my Sergeants says "Gun control is having a good sight picture".
__________________ Platoon Commander, 6 Platoon, B Company 10/27th Battalion Royal South Australia Regiment ![]() PRO PATRIA |
| |
| | Post 12 |
| Forum Lubrication Engineer | I believe all guns need to be registered, and I know that doesn't happen. So gun control to me is to shot what you are aiming at. |
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Milforum's Postmaster | Gun Control is having a steady hand while firing. |
| |
| | Post 14 |
| ICBM | I chose 3rd.
__________________ ~when a man does his best, what else is there? Gen.George S.Patton |
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I like Vermont's gun control laws.... Besides if you are going to use a gun to do a crime it isn’t going to be a legit gun...I mean seriously take the guns away from the innocent people and the only ones that will have them are the police and the criminals... You can go in any alley USA and get a gun easier than you can at a gun shop legit and that is where a problem lies.... |
| |
| | Post 16 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I voted for the second. No convicted criminals. I also agree with waiting periods and profficeny tests though. Registration just scares me a little bit. No required memberships of gun clubs either. But there needs to be some common sense as well. Unless we are under the threat of invasion nobody needs an RPG or a .50 cal. Assault rifles, fine they have a valid use for home defense.
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 17 | |
| Optio | IMHO Felony conviction = no gun possession. No resgistration. The government doesn't need to know how many guns I have if any. No restrictions on full-auto, supressors, short-barreled rifles, magazine capacity. All firearms are classified as firearms. None of this title I, title II, title III nonsense. No restriction on concealed or open carry. (Like in Vermont and Alaska) Quote:
Last edited by Bugfatty; December 13th, 2006 at 11:29. | |
| |
| | Post 18 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
In the end I selected the "guns must be under lock and key" option when I voted as that just makes sense otherwise I too would have supported the "firearms must be registered" option.
__________________ If horses would have hands and could paint with their hands and create works of art like the humans, then horses would form and paint the gods with the shape of horses and they would build sculptures according to their own bodies. - Xenophanes Last edited by MontyB; December 13th, 2006 at 19:23. | |
| |
| | Post 19 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Gun control is an absolute crock of sh*t. All it does is takes the guns away from the law abiding citizens. The criminals weren't lining up to hand in their weapons at the buy back. So now the majority of automatic weapons etc., are firmly in the hands of the "bad guys". Any one of responsible age should be able to own any firearm they wish. However the laws regarding persons using firearms in the commission of a felony should be absolutely draconian. Something like, the sentence for the crime committed should be doubled and no person with a criminal record should be permitted to purchase, own, be in possession of or be in the company of others with a firearm. |
| |
| | Post 20 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
That is the unfortunate consequence of any law though (only those who follow the rules will respect it) but if you are going to argue that line then isn't it just as valid to argue that no one should own any firearms? I am a supporter of our existing gun laws, I have a collectors license with B- Pistols and E-MSSA endorsements I have been through every hoop the government can think of they are without a doubt restrictive but for the moment they do work "for us" I certainly don't have any desire to see the rest of the world follow us though. | |
| |