![]() | About GERMAN tank "Ratte" Page 2 |
![]() |
| | #11 | |
| | Quote:
| |
![]() | |
| |
| | #12 |
| | Re: GERMAN tank "Ratte" info
I want one! Upgraded with modern armor, ammo, fire control, and engines! |
| | #13 |
| | |
| | #14 |
| |
Seems just about what I would like to have during Rush Hour Traffic.
|
| | #15 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #16 |
| |
I did see anyone bring up man power.
![]() |
| | #17 |
| |
Now,Hitler's dream come to BF1942. Sorry,this is joke. Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build bridges even when there are no rivers. Nikita Khrushchev |
| | #18 | |
| | Quote:
We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld | |
| | #19 |
| |
thats not a tank....too much firepower and armor at he expence of mobilety. tigers and king tigers were slow and unreliable enough, and they were toys compared with this. what roads and bridges can supprot this monster? a tank is not a moving fortress with aa guns , it is a moving cannon with reasonable protection for its crew. we have sp artillery, sp aa guns and infantry units to support tanks on the battlefield, and they shouldent be fielded on their own....
|
| | #20 |
| |
It would be a static fire support position. It'd be akin to taking a chunk of the maginot line and putting on wheels. Useless really. But imagine it in a hull down overwatch position on a battlefield.
|
![]() |