![]() | About Georgia "Invaded" By Russian Forces Page 7 |
![]() |
| | #61 | ||
| | Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||
![]() | |
| |
| | #62 | ||
| | Quote:
Or it could provoke them into even greater action on top of this what makes you think the Russians see the US as a "powerhouse" either lets be realistic here if China decided to call in its markers the US economy would collapse overnight. Quote:
We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld Last edited by MontyB; August 10th, 2008 at 04:10.. | ||
| | #63 |
| |
Lol true on the China thing. How don't they see the US as a threat? I know I do not need to discuss history with you. How long did it take Russia to get kicked out of Afghanistan? Before you bring up Vietnam we actually won those battles, the Russians got their asses handed to them. They are not stupid people, they would rather build their economy and force then wage a war. Is this tiny province worth waging a full blown war over it, is your pride worth it? This is what Russia would be asking itself and I bet I could come up with the answer.
Infantry leads...... Last edited by Big_Z; August 10th, 2008 at 04:20.. |
| | #64 | |
| | Quote:
Because you are talking about the two primary nuclear powers they simply are not going to put themselves in a position that will ensure mutual destruction which means they will not risk direct involvement on a battlefield unless there is a strategic reason for both parties to be there and I hate to break it to ya but a mountain range in the middle of nowhere is probably just not going to be strategic enough. Now given that the Russians are already there the USA will not risk sending troops of its own on top of this from a purely logistical point of view any US "campaign" in the region against a well equipped and supplied opposition (even a technically inferior one) would be almost untenable. | |
| | #65 |
| |
No, not an "open" confrontation. You are not tracking on how the US works. A simple "training" mission for our "Iraqi" allies is something entirely different. And yes we do have troops in Georgia training them for Iraq so what would stop us from sending more? Georgia sent troops to Iraq for us, thats hard to ignore. I do not think the US would openly declare war on Russia short of them attacking us.
Last edited by Big_Z; August 10th, 2008 at 04:33.. |
| | #66 | |
| | Quote:
![]() ![]() Anger itself does more harm than the condition which aroused anger. - Samurai maxim | |
| | #67 | |
| | Quote:
1) I think its pretty clear that this is not an invasion of Georgia itself while they may be sending troops in the SO region its not really expanding beyond those borders. 2) I doubt that a couple of hundred "advisers" would prevent a full blown invasion if they were to launch one. 3) Lets be realistic here shall we, this is little more than a Russian power play it will run its course and the Russians will be back home by the end of the week/month and everything will carry on as normal it simply will not evolve into anything more than a storm in a teacup. | |
| | #68 |
| |
Obviously, that would be different if Georgia were already a NATO member. I would be surprised if it goes any larger scale but ya never, the world is funky.
|
| | #69 |
| |
The US already has a couple hundred "advisers" there, 10,000 would be an entirely different thing. Russia has overstepped its boundaries, literary. You want to level one of your own cities to the ground fine, we will ignore that. They are now crossing into an American friends territory, dangerous ****. We have a saying, "Stay in your own lane". Russia has failed.
|
| | #70 |
| | |
![]() |