| |
| | Post 21 |
| Buttercup ![]() | He has a point there, but I think wearing ties into combat is just a bit too much to ask, I mean it's hard enough to keep from getting stains on your tie in civilian life, just think of the junk you'd get on one in battle.
__________________ No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen. |
| |
| | Post 22 |
| Centurion | Then you could show your tie off to your grandkids as a real life medal of honor. |
| |
| | Post 23 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | well, this is the same guy who believed in all this other stuff... and no it wasn't in the movie that i saw
__________________ Don't mess with me, I'll tell Redleg on you!!! |
| |
| | Post 24 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | sorry midnight forgetfulness... i dind't see any ties in the movie |
| |
| | Post 25 |
| Milites Gregarius | tough one, the first guy to come to mind is J. Lawton Collins |
| |
| | Post 26 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | another... chesty puller... reminds me of patton lol |
| |
| | Post 27 |
| Centurion | The Marines fight like Patton tried to get his soldiers to. So if Patton were the CO of a Marine division and were up to his usual butt kicking then what do you think the result would have been? |
| |
| | Post 28 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | there was probably a reason the dear lord didn't put him there |
| |
| | Post 29 |
| Centurion | I bet that marine division could have single handedly conquered the world. Any thoughts? |
| |
| | Post 30 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Ok, heres the thing about Patton. He was a tank man, always was, I just don't think he could handle a light infantry force like the USMC, even though they do use Armor and artillery. Bacially the type of fighting he did and Europe was radically different from the Pacific.
__________________ No Voice |
| |