| |
May 22nd, 2004
| Post 11 |
| Milites Gregarius | i have always liked the F-15, so that is my choice
__________________ Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning. - Colonel David M. Shoup -Team ION |
|
|
May 22nd, 2004
| Post 12 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | lancaster  very good,he was damnbuster too 
__________________  |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 13 |
| Optio | personaly i think the lancaster was one of the best bombers ever built, and the hawker hurricane was a great fighter because it was easy to fixif it hapened to get shot up, a very rugged and realiable pair of planes. |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 14 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Bf-109 was good high caliber rounds,not so great speed,but a good plane.Spitfire was more manowarouble and faster,i stick to the Mesershmit 262  |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 15 |
| Cadet Moderator  | I thought this was a POST WWII thread. Oh well. My favorite Post WWII fighter is the CF-18 Hornet and bomber is the B-2 Spirit.
__________________ Pte K. Steliga Canadian Forces School of Aerospace Control Operations QL3 0027 Per ardua ad astra |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 16 |
| Milforum Moderator   | Post; yespost WWII!!!!!
__________________  |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 17 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | What Me 262 could be sorted as a post WWII fighter Please dont yel at me!!!!!!  |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2004
| Post 18 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | F-86 Sabre for sheer beauty F-15E Strike Eagle for horsepower F-16 Falcon for adaptability A-10 Thunderbolt for whoopass ability and bein' butt ugly and scary lookin' |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2004
| Post 19 |
| Optio | Post; wellthe B-52 is pertty awsome for bombers,and for fighters i have to go with the F-16 Tomcats
__________________ Do or do not there is no try. Yoda |
|
|
|
July 11th, 2004
| Post 20 |
| Centurion | B-70!!! That's a hell of a good plane! It isn't beaten, still! Phantom II, F-22, F-15, F-14, B-2, F-117............ |
|
|
